Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Not\s+real\s+SO2R\s+nor\s+SO5R\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+Not\s+real\s+SO2R\s+nor\s+SO5R\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Not real SO2R nor SO5R (score: 1): Author: Charles Harpole <hs0zcw@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:04:56 +0700; Way too many SO2R operations are fake. That is, too often, the robot CQ machine is left on only to hold a frequency while the live operator is running on a different band. Even with the cursed Skimme; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00357.html (7,504 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Not real SO2R nor SO5R (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:43:34 -0500; Charly, I don't think that is right. I'm sure there are many SO2R operators who are using software (as TRLog used to do) which will resume CQing when not actively transmitting on the second band. Thi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-02/msg00370.html (9,336 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]