- 1. [CQ-Contest] RE: CQ WPX-A Modest Proposal (score: 1)
- Author: n2au@lightlink.com (Art & Linda Hubert)
- Date: Sun Apr 5 13:47:54 1998
- After reading all these words of wisdom on contesting; who has the advantage, who is a better operator, etc., the plain facts are that 99% of the time, when it comes to DX contests using the present
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00088.html (8,017 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] RE: CQ WPX-A Modest Proposal (score: 1)
- Author: kw4t@erols.com (Dan Weisenburger)
- Date: Mon Apr 6 08:12:44 1998
- I really don't care how many hours are available since I'm a little pistol.I have come to realize though, by sitting here on the east coast I can hear Europe as early as 1900 U.T.C. on 40 meters. And
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00100.html (8,229 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] RE: CQ WPX-A Modest Proposal (score: 1)
- Author: trey@kkn.net (Trey Garlough)
- Date: Tue Apr 7 08:36:29 1998
- In the 13 years preceding the change in format from 30 to 36 hours, the US SOAB competition in WPX SSB was won three times by three different west coast stations and one time by a midwest station. I
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00118.html (7,973 bytes)
- 4. [CQ-Contest] RE: CQ WPX-A Modest Proposal (score: 1)
- Author: kl7y@alaska.net (Dan Robbins)
- Date: Thu Apr 9 20:40:08 1998
- But this does not prove that the 30 hour contest rule was more equitable than a 36 hour rule. Rather, it probably relects the relative contest activity of JAs (slightly down) and Europeans (huge incr
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00154.html (7,912 bytes)
- 5. [CQ-Contest] RE: CQ WPX-A Modest Proposal (score: 1)
- Author: trey@kkn.net (Trey Garlough)
- Date: Sun Apr 12 01:45:05 1998
- Yeah, *probably.* Regrettably we will never *know* unless we return to the 30 hour system that yielded a non-trivial number of non-east coast US champions during the aforementioned period (and incid
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00181.html (9,043 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu