Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+SO2R\s+REMOTE\s+CONTESTING\s*$/: 66 ]

Total 66 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R REMOTE CONTESTING (score: 1)
Author: Michael Keane K1MK <k1mk@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:45:33 -0400
And it's accreditation that is a logical reason for DXCC to require that the control point be located within the same DXCC entity as the transmitter and receiver. A remote operation without need for
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00688.html (11,709 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R REMOTE CONTESTING (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:40:19 EST
You didn't ask for it, but here is my 2 cents worth anyway. It seems to me that the purpose of a ham radio contest is to contact other stations at other locations - that other signal emanating from s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00690.html (9,072 bytes)

43. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R REMOTE CONTESTING (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Neiger" <n6tj@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 14:31:58 -0700
(snip) Steve-o As recently-elected Chief of All Curmudgeons, may I say you're statement above is probably the most accurate part of your (following) message. 73 always, Jim Neiger N6TJ, C.O.A.Cs (pro
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00700.html (10,330 bytes)

44. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R REMOTE CONTESTING (score: 1)
Author: Bill Coleman <aa4lr@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 08:37:45 -0400
Seems to me that as long as all the signal origination (transmitter) and signal capture (receiver) points reside in a single 500m circle, there's really no issue here. The results would be no differe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00425.html (7,596 bytes)

45. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R REMOTE CONTESTING (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Parry" <BPARRY@RGV.RR.COM>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 08:21:15 -0500
I agree with Bill....I don't particularly like it but I agree. I think the most important point he made was the last one. "The key behavior we're looking to prevent is the use of multiple receiving a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00427.html (9,717 bytes)

46. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R REMOTE CONTESTING (score: 1)
Author: Steve Harrison <k0xp@dandy.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 16:58:47 +0000
By Honor: just the same way that we all assume that when someone enters a competition claiming 100W or less, they REALLY ARE running 100W or less ;o| Steve, K0XP _____________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00433.html (7,528 bytes)

47. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R REMOTE CONTESTING (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 16:51:14 -0500
I'm with both Bills on this one. As long as there is only one site, and the operator is only claiming the site of the actual RF generation as his location (a VE4 operating remotely to a KP4 site must
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00435.html (11,992 bytes)

48. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R REMOTE CONTESTING (score: 1)
Author: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 12:34:32 -0000
Not to start this thread again but, as one who was quite vocally (typingly, anyway) opposed to long distance remote stations, I have to disagree with that comment, Kelly. I am more envious of the op
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00437.html (14,531 bytes)

49. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R REMOTE CONTESTING (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 10:29:17 -0700
Having done some playing with remote operation - I think it would be hard to be as effective as an operator when using a remote station - compared to being there in person. The biggest issue is late
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00439.html (8,096 bytes)

50. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R REMOTE CONTESTING (score: 1)
Author: "Jukka Klemola" <jukka.klemola@elisanet.fi>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:21:38 +0300
--Alkuper&auml;inen viesti-- L&auml;hett&auml;j&auml;: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] Puolesta Paul J. Piercey ... pretends I think going to KP4 is Fun.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00440.html (9,563 bytes)

51. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R REMOTE CONTESTING (score: 1)
Author: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 16:25:24 +0100
I hold it to be self-evident that not all QSOs are created equal, and that they are devalued to the extent that there is a substitute for RF in the path between the operators. For example: 1. Skype Q
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00441.html (8,627 bytes)

52. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R REMOTE CONTESTING (score: 1)
Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 12:43:13 -0700
I often use a voice keyer that is implemented as an ISA card installed in the logging computer. Because of where the computer is located in the shack, my effective microphone cable length can be 30'
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00442.html (9,659 bytes)

53. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R REMOTE CONTESTING (score: 1)
Author: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:31:12 +0100
No - contest rules typically permit wired circuits within a 500-meter circle. I care deeply about amateur radio. There's no practical difference between your 3000 km microphone line, and a 3000 km Ec
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00443.html (9,222 bytes)

54. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R REMOTE CONTESTING (score: 1)
Author: "hank k8dd" <k8dd@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 17:15:17 -0400
I've had my K2/100 on my LAN using the K2 remote & server software. Even on a 100MB LAN the delay is, as Tree says, unacceptable except for a FD type operation! And ..... there is absolutely nothing
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00444.html (9,159 bytes)

55. [CQ-Contest] SO2R REMOTE CONTESTING (score: 1)
Author: "James Cain" <cainjim@mindspring.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 19:36:36 -0400
If anyone needs proof that we need some sunspots, this thread is it. Jim Cain, K1TN Atlantic City, NJ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00445.html (8,293 bytes)

56. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R REMOTE CONTESTING (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@iowadsl.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:54:59 -0500
I assume you just shout directly into the feedpoint of your antenna? Jim Rhodes K0XU jim@rhodesend.net Experience is the thing you have left when everything else is gone. ____________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00446.html (9,801 bytes)

57. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R REMOTE CONTESTING (score: 1)
Author: Zoli Pitman HA1AG <ha1ag@hg6n.hu>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 21:38:05 +0200
As far as I can interpret those, that distance/diameter is meant for RF-generating/emmitting/receiving station elements and not for baseband and control signals. Actually that is a radio contact betw
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00466.html (9,905 bytes)

58. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R REMOTE CONTESTING (score: 1)
Author: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 22:51:50 +0100
I agree remote control is a reality. All I'm trying to do is put down a marker for controlling and regulating it for the purposes of contesting and award chasing. I maintain, and I know the remote-co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00470.html (10,227 bytes)

59. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R REMOTE CONTESTING (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Naumann" <w5ov@w5ov.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:08:08 -0500
Paul, I disagree with you totally, but I wanted to point out a couple of things in your last note that cause me to think that you may not have thought out what you are asserting: "How then can we exp
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00472.html (11,142 bytes)

60. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R REMOTE CONTESTING (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:37:03 -0500
I could not have asked this better. Paul: I'm with Bob - I wonder what you're saying is different about the difference between 25 inches, 25 feet, 25 miles, etc. Mark, N5OT _________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-06/msg00473.html (9,444 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu