Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CQ\-Contest\]\s+When\s+is\s+a\s+QSO\s+not\s+a\s+QSO\?\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 08:34:39 -0000
Was "Remote Site Contesting Rules - Getting out of hand". Paul is right. Amateur radio, and contesting in particular, is a point-to-point (single-point to single-point), personto-person, solely-RF-ba
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00334.html (8,318 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO? (score: 1)
Author: "Gerry Hull" <gerry.hull@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 07:56:44 -0500
The problem is all contests CURRENTLY allow this type of QSO! If you are so opposed to the concept, and you found out post-contest that your KH6 QSO was from a remotely-controlled station, would you
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00337.html (10,489 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO? (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 08:15:42 -0500
Paul #2 replied: You're losing me, Paul #2, when you say point-to-point, in the case of a VE3 remotely using a station in KH6, is his point in Hawaii or Canada? I don't see why this is such a big dea
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00339.html (8,565 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO? (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Naumann" <w5ov@w5ov.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 08:23:15 -0500
Paul, While it would be nice to limit technical advances in contesting to retain some reverence for our collective history, time marches on, and what we have to tolerate must change. Imagine if we co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00340.html (11,115 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO? (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 08:54:37 -0500 (CDT)
Maybe I'm wrong, but I think the idea being put forth is that when you have a remote station located far away, you are working the operator at HIS QTH, not the remote station's location. In the parag
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00343.html (11,105 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO? (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Hilding" <dx35@hilding.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 06:47:19 -0800
No, No, & No. He is first working a station that is under the control of an operator. If Paul works HC8N, PJ2T or one of the other GREAT Multi stations in a Contest, does he inquire at time of the QS
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00345.html (8,405 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO? (score: 1)
Author: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:16:56 -0500
So anyone who can't be physically located at their transmitter/receiver should just go jump in a lake? At a time when more and more amateurs are shutting down because of noisy environments, noisy HO
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00347.html (9,353 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 19:22:46 -0000
Thanks, Paul. I can live with that. I would even be more lenient in allowing that any remote operation has to be confined to a call area (for contests like SS, it would be confined to areas used as
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00352.html (11,452 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO? (score: 1)
Author: "Trent and Lorraine Sampson" <vk4ti@sampson.net.au>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 06:32:31 +1000
By our definitions (VK) the operator holds a Certificate of Proficiency to operate a station. The station is licensed to a location so VK4TI is licensed to my home address but technically can be oper
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00355.html (13,445 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO? (score: 1)
Author: "Gerry Hull" <gerry@w1ve.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 15:58:25 -0500
Paul, "But, like you say, if the object of the exercise is to just talk to people regardless of where they are, then use Echolink, Skype, or the telephone. I got involved with amateur radio to talk t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00360.html (15,571 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO? (score: 1)
Author: Eric Scace K3NA <eric@k3na.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 17:28:51 -0400
Paul -- I would be a bit more cautious in construction the geographical constraint. If a guy in NE Ohio uses a station across the state line in Erie PA, that's not nearly as far apart as someone in P
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00363.html (10,907 bytes)

12. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 22:47:07 -0000
"We don't care where the op is sitting! In fact, we don't even care if a (human) operator is present. (Computer controlled contest stations HAVE been tried!)." That says it all. From that comment, i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00365.html (16,482 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 21:45:31 -0000
So you are saying that, if I had a station in Mongolia and a good (perhaps even dedicated, should I have the necessary monetary resources to provide such) Internet link, I could fire it up this week
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00366.html (12,849 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO? (score: 1)
Author: "Paul J. Piercey" <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 23:35:28 -0000
If you feel that way then the operator in Ontario is superfluous. A remote station set up to automatically reply to your callsign interogation would suffice would it not? I think I stated my case qu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00368.html (11,749 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO? (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 00:50:40 -0400 (EDT)
To continue with my previous example. Working me in KH6 ia all about RF-based point-to-point technology. It couldn't take place without it. That's pretty harsh! Please note that my operating a KH6 st
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00377.html (12,223 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO? (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 00:59:55 -0400 (EDT)
You exchange contest data with the operator, and maybe get a warm, fuzzy experience if you know the guy, but none of it happens without the equipment (the station) and the location of that station m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00378.html (9,358 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO? (score: 1)
Author: "Mark Beckwith" <n5ot@n5ot.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 05:12:38 -0500
This is a spirited conversation! Paul, you're putting words in my mouth. Certainly the idea of a fully automated station capable of working contestants at a credible rate has been brought up before.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00379.html (9,449 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO? (score: 1)
Author: kd4d@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 16:03:23 +0000
[...] These ARE NOT universally help opinions. I am against permitting computer controlled contest stations to compete, for example. These issues are not settled. 73, Mark, KD4D _____________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00393.html (8,762 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO? (score: 1)
Author: "Yuri VE3DZ" <ve3dz@rigexpert.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:20:21 -0400
Being always behind the top line of technology, I think I'm with Paul, VO1HE on this one... If a lot of guys will start to use remote sites for contesting, I'm afraid I'd rather quit and go fishing.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00395.html (9,890 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] When is a QSO not a QSO? (score: 1)
Author: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 19:17:33 -0500
Yuri, Why? When you contact a station in Aruba in WW, you say to him 59 05 and he says 59 09. That's the extent of your conversation. As long as your signal is actually travelling directly from your
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00409.html (12,525 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu