Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+Getting\s+Back\s+In\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+Getting\s+Back\s+In\s*$/: 34 ]

Total 34 documents matching your query.

1. [Karlnet] Getting Back In (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 04:58:08 -0500; Hello, Confident my problem was in the routes I decided to play with the routes. I gave the radio interfaces private routes 10.10.10.1 and routed the real network over that via indirect routes. This; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00220.html (9,584 bytes)
2. RE: [Karlnet] Getting Back In (score: 1): Author: "Jayson Baker" <jbaker@peakinet.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 06:41:23 -0700; Routing is routing is routing. Whether you're using private IP's and routing public over it, or just routing public - you're still routing. If you're only doing a point-to-point-to-point link I'd rec; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00223.html (11,281 bytes)
3. Re: [Karlnet] Getting Back In (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 15:18:15 -0500; I understand that but I failed to assign the radio ports the any ips and now I need to get into it remotely via a wireless link not the ethernet port that is why i was wondering how or if it is poss; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00225.html (10,705 bytes)
4. RE: [Karlnet] Getting Back In (score: 1): Author: "Jayson Baker" <jbaker@peakinet.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 13:21:27 -0700; So the one in the middle, the KN-200, is in routing mode, with no IP's? Go to either RG on either end, set them to bridging mode - plug in your laptop to the Ethernet port and hit scan, you'll see th; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00226.html (11,793 bytes)
5. Re: [Karlnet] Getting Back In (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 15:37:49 -0500; The relay kn-200 which is the one in the middle it is in routing & bridging mode. It does have ips assigned to it. It actually has 12.96.250.38 via a direct route to interface 1 and as the prefered; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00227.html (14,298 bytes)
6. RE: [Karlnet] Getting Back In (score: 1): Author: "Jayson Baker" <jbaker@peakinet.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 13:53:47 -0700; Your descriptions are very difficult to follow. I think I understand it as your KN-200 doesn't have any IP's assigned to the wireless interfaces... this doesn't matter. Connect to it on either wirele; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00228.html (15,708 bytes)
7. Re: [Karlnet] Getting Back In (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 16:15:44 -0500; the No, Its not that I do not know HOW to get to the Ethernet port of the KN-200 it is I do not have PHYSICAL access to any of it at this time. Other wise I would have just plugged into it via a cro; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00229.html (10,568 bytes)
8. RE: [Karlnet] Getting Back In (score: 1): Author: "Jayson Baker" <jbaker@peakinet.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 14:21:09 -0700; No, you won't be able to get to it through the AP-1000 unless it, and the adjacent RG, are both in bridging mode. How can you get to it via routed if there's nothing routed? Regards, Jayson A. Baker; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00230.html (11,483 bytes)
9. Re: [Karlnet] Getting Back In (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 16:24:59 -0500; if They are in bridge mode. Everything is in bridge mode, only exception is the kn-200 which is in router & bridge mode. Thats why I was saying I SHOULD be able to see it from my home link. Thanks,; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00231.html (9,163 bytes)
10. Re: [Karlnet] Getting Back In (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 19:22:19 -0500; No this did not work. I plugged right into the RG's Ethernet port via a crossover cable, this is the RG connected to one of the radios in the kn-200. Yes it is in bridge mode and it does not pass the; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00232.html (9,933 bytes)
11. RE: [Karlnet] Getting Back In (score: 1): Author: "Jayson Baker" <jbaker@peakinet.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 17:26:20 -0700; Is the IP on your computer in the same subnet as that of the KN-200? Regards, Jayson A. Baker Peak Internet Solutions No this did not work. I plugged right into the RG's Ethernet port via a crossover; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00233.html (10,355 bytes)
12. Re: [Karlnet] Getting Back In (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 19:46:35 -0500; Yes they are all in the same subnet. John the routed _______________________________________________ Karlnet mailing list Karlnet@WISPNotes.com http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00234.html (11,038 bytes)
13. RE: [Karlnet] Getting Back In (score: 1): Author: "Jayson Baker" <jbaker@peakinet.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 18:52:17 -0700; And does it show up in the local network scan? Regards, Jayson A. Baker Peak Internet Solutions Yes they are all in the same subnet. John the routed _______________________________________________ Ka; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00235.html (11,530 bytes)
14. Re: [Karlnet] Getting Back In (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 20:59:41 -0500; No, it does not show up in the configurator under list of scanned devices. It does however show in the ip arp table of the rg1000's connected to its radio interfaces that are in bridging mode. I can; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00236.html (12,528 bytes)
15. Re: [Karlnet] Getting Back In (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 21:43:10 -0500; Here is a visual, this should make things more clear :) http://www.tcpbbs.net/layout.html John [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com] the ideas? and is SHOULD ________________________________________; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00237.html (12,112 bytes)
16. Re: [Karlnet] Getting Back In (score: 1): Author: Daniel Wright <dwright@wonderwave.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 02:40:24 -0600; How are you powering the unit? We did an install last week with a kn100 board and POE. With the old radio(AB) it showed an ethernet link and would pass data, and the new radio(kn100) would also show; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00238.html (13,750 bytes)
17. Re: [Karlnet] Getting Back In (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 04:35:51 -0500; We are powering it via poe the run is only about 20'. from a tank house on top of a 15 story building. The unit was working just fine radios and all we are not even using the Ethernet on it, the only; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-11/msg00239.html (15,377 bytes)
18. [Karlnet] Getting Back In (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 04:58:08 -0500; Hello, Confident my problem was in the routes I decided to play with the routes. I gave the radio interfaces private routes 10.10.10.1 and routed the real network over that via indirect routes. This; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00150.html (9,582 bytes)
19. RE: [Karlnet] Getting Back In (score: 1): Author: "Jayson Baker" <jbaker@peakinet.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 06:41:23 -0700; Routing is routing is routing. Whether you're using private IP's and routing public over it, or just routing public - you're still routing. If you're only doing a point-to-point-to-point link I'd rec; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00154.html (11,215 bytes)
20. Re: [Karlnet] Getting Back In (score: 1): Author: jna <jna@tcpbbs.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 15:18:15 -0500; I understand that but I failed to assign the radio ports the any ips and now I need to get into it remotely via a wireless link not the ethernet port that is why i was wondering how or if it is poss; /archives//html/Karlnet/2004-04/msg00155.html (10,679 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]