Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+Which\s+F\/W\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Karlnet\]\s+Which\s+F\/W\?\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [Karlnet] Which F/W? (score: 1): Author: Noyan Dede <noyan@onur.net>; Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 10:26:10 +0300; Hi guys, This is my first message to the list. We are a wireless equipment provider in Turkey. For one of our customers we've installed a base station and 5 satellites for internet service distributi; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00055.html (9,720 bytes)
2. RE: [Karlnet] Which F/W? (score: 1): Author: "Dan Metcalf" <dan.metcalf@wbsysnet.com>; Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 10:29:39 -0400; If your limiting your interface to 128k it will drop packets and impact performance at when the link gets near 128k But they may NOT be your problem.. could be interference? [mailto:karlnet-bounces@W; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00057.html (11,495 bytes)
3. RE: [Karlnet] Which F/W? (score: 1): Author: "Caleb Carroll" <karlnet@pathcom.ca>; Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 09:18:16 -0600; Could be. I would suggest you downgrade to 4.31 firmware and see if the problem still exists. 4.43k is whack. ** REPLY SEPARATOR **; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00058.html (12,463 bytes)
4. Re: [Karlnet] Which F/W? (score: 1): Author: Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com>; Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 16:39:41 -0400; Caleb Carroll wrote: Could be. I would suggest you downgrade to 4.31 firmware and see if the problem still exists. 4.43k is whack. Hello, 4.43K may cause some problems for some people (I don't recall; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00063.html (10,614 bytes)
5. Re: [Karlnet] Which F/W? (score: 1): Author: "Bruno Lopes F. Cabral" <bruno@openline.com.br>; Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 17:40:55 -0300; Hi there is it possible to use karlnet 4.43k with a tertiary firmware other than the one it loads? if so, how? Cheers !3runo from Brazil; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00064.html (9,329 bytes)
6. Re: [Karlnet] Which F/W? (score: 1): Author: Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com>; Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 16:48:30 -0400; Bruno Lopes F. Cabral wrote: Hi there I did some tests with some 4.x builds I have that don't load any tertiary firmware, and the retransmit problem does not exist when the base station radio is usin; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00065.html (10,188 bytes)
7. Re: [Karlnet] Which F/W? (score: 1): Author: "Bruno Lopes F. Cabral" <bruno@openline.com.br>; Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 17:55:31 -0300; Hi there don't bother, I was just curious because I'm new with Karlnet (just installed my first licenses on field) and because I usually downgrade 7.x firmwares to 6.16 to use the cards in linux. so; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00066.html (9,592 bytes)
8. Re: [Karlnet] Which F/W? (score: 1): Author: "Caleb Carroll" <karlnet@pathcom.ca>; Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 15:13:20 -0600; 7.28 is the only 7.xx firmware that doesn't work with Linux TurboCell. 8.10 & 8.72 also work with Linux TC. ** REPLY SEPARATOR **; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00067.html (10,354 bytes)
9. Re: [Karlnet] Which F/W? (score: 1): Author: "Bruno Lopes F. Cabral" <bruno@openline.com.br>; Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 18:20:23 -0300; Hi there I meant linux without turbocell/with orinoco_cs 0.11b, sorry thanks for the info, anyway Cheers !3runo from Brazil; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00068.html (9,169 bytes)
10. Re: [Karlnet] Which F/W? (score: 1): Author: "Caleb Carroll" <karlnet@pathcom.ca>; Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 15:32:20 -0600; Problems with v4.43k firmware: being run shows up in list of test partners. eg. A base station with a single PC card can do a link test with it's self. being run shows other base stations that are op; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00069.html (10,122 bytes)
11. Re: [Karlnet] Which F/W? (score: 1): Author: "Bruno Lopes F. Cabral" <bruno@openline.com.br>; Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 18:44:09 -0300; Hi there I noticed the problem (2) bellow on my setup, a bridged point to point link between 2 RG1000s with Satelite 4.43k firmware is there a changelog anywhere between 4.31 and up versions? I wish; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00070.html (10,458 bytes)
12. Re: [Karlnet] Which F/W? (score: 1): Author: Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com>; Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 18:41:43 -0400; Problems with v4.43k firmware: I guess the question of up/downgrading is a matter of what problem you are trying to solve. I don't like trading a solution for a new problem or problems so I've downgr; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00071.html (11,329 bytes)
13. Re: [Karlnet] Which F/W? (score: 1): Author: helio@compuland.com.br; Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 12:05:59 -0300; Yes, I noticed that... After the upgrade the retransmissons got higher. also one bridge got completely deaf - both cards stopped working and we needed to power cycle it. It's connected to a UPS, and; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00073.html (9,197 bytes)
14. Re: [Karlnet] Which F/W? (score: 1): Author: Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 11:08:32 -0400; helio@compuland.com.br wrote: On 9 Jul 2003 at 16:39, Chris Conn wrote: We have found this to cause mild to severe retransmit percentages in the base stations. The simple fact of upgrading to 4.43K (; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00074.html (9,028 bytes)
15. [Karlnet] Which F/W? (score: 1): Author: "office" <office@intersat-telecom.ro>; Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 19:22:59 +0300; I also find that retransmits increase with 4.43K! from 3-5% to 8-10% Chivu; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00075.html (7,782 bytes)
16. Re: [Karlnet] Which F/W? (score: 1): Author: Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 13:15:06 -0400; office wrote: I also find that retransmits increase with 4.43K! from 3-5% to 8-10% Chivu Hello, Therefore, there are other systems in the field that exhibit what I am seeing. I have found the increas; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00076.html (8,148 bytes)
17. Re: [Karlnet] Which F/W? (score: 1): Author: helio@compuland.com.br; Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 19:32:04 -0300; Is hard to pick the exact figure, but I needed to downgrade to 4.43d beta (uses 8.10 firmware) due to stability problems. I started having trouble with some customers after the upgrade. I've downgra; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00077.html (8,647 bytes)
18. Re: [Karlnet] Which F/W? (score: 1): Author: Chris Conn <cconn@abacom.com>; Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 09:18:43 -0400; helio@compuland.com.br wrote: Hello, What magnitude of increase of retransmits was seen when upgrading to 4.43K on the base? Is hard to pick the exact figure, but I needed to downgrade to 4.43d beta; /archives//html/Karlnet/2003-07/msg00081.html (9,488 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]