Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+Covering\s+Solar\s+Panels\s+To\s+Assess\s+RFI\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] Covering Solar Panels To Assess RFI (score: 1)
Author: Tony <dxdx@optonline.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 20:44:08 -0400
All: The the inverter on my neighbors solar panel installation was recently replaced to reduce the RFI caused by the system. The swap only made a slight change in the interference. This left the sola
/archives//html/RFI/2020-08/msg00030.html (8,023 bytes)

2. Re: [RFI] Covering Solar Panels To Assess RFI (score: 1)
Author: Don Moman VE6JY <ve6jy.1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 19:15:52 -0600
Inverters are inherently noisy. So you replace a noisy one with another noisy one. You cover the panels so the inverters have nothing to invert. That doesn't mean the solar panels are the culprit. Pl
/archives//html/RFI/2020-08/msg00031.html (8,623 bytes)

3. Re: [RFI] Covering Solar Panels To Assess RFI (score: 1)
Author: KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 20:53:05 -0700
Inverters are inherently noisy. So you replace a noisy one with another noisy one. You cover the panels so the inverters have nothing to invert. That doesn't mean the solar panels are the culprit. Pl
/archives//html/RFI/2020-08/msg00032.html (8,230 bytes)

4. Re: [RFI] Covering Solar Panels To Assess RFI (score: 1)
Author: Steve Dyer W1SRD via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 22:57:03 -0700
If this is a Solar Edge system, are they using "optimizers"? They are DC to DC, but still create switching noise. I'd look there first. Unless your neighbor switched to a known quiet inverter it was
/archives//html/RFI/2020-08/msg00033.html (9,320 bytes)

5. Re: [RFI] Covering Solar Panels To Assess RFI (score: 1)
Author: Tony Brock-Fisher via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 06:53:32 -0400
Tony Was this experiment conducted with the per-panel optimizers connected to the panels? This is a critical question. It appears the conclusion of the experiment is that the panels themselves and by
/archives//html/RFI/2020-08/msg00034.html (10,997 bytes)

6. Re: [RFI] Covering Solar Panels To Assess RFI (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 13:27:57 +0000
I think that it is highly unlikely that the panels themselves are creating noise. Paul Cianciolo, W1VLF, has a Solar Edge system at his house. He had found the usual wiring, grounding and optimizer i
/archives//html/RFI/2020-08/msg00035.html (12,086 bytes)

7. Re: [RFI] Covering Solar Panels To Assess RFI (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 08:17:10 -0700
I agree with Ed and Tony Brock-Fisher's observations. More than a year ago, I gave Solar Edge's guy, who lives in the SF Bay area, a tutorial on the topic, and told him that the solution was design e
/archives//html/RFI/2020-08/msg00036.html (12,710 bytes)

8. Re: [RFI] Covering Solar Panels To Assess RFI (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:11:41 +0000
Although it seems intuitive that escalating these problems to the FCC or other actions with legal implications will speed things up, just the opposite it true. Right now, we have good contact with So
/archives//html/RFI/2020-08/msg00037.html (15,577 bytes)

9. Re: [RFI] Covering Solar Panels To Assess RFI (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 13:12:17 -0700
Thanks Ed. I would like that. Yes, I think that properly addressing grounding at the mains interface is at least as critical as filtering. 73, Jim _______________________________________________ RFI
/archives//html/RFI/2020-08/msg00038.html (8,648 bytes)

10. Re: [RFI] Covering Solar Panels To Assess RFI (score: 1)
Author: WW3S <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 01:10:34 +0000
There was a good conversation about this a year or so ago on this reflector. As I recall, the system generated interference with the panels disconnected. Seems like certain panel manufacturers were s
/archives//html/RFI/2020-08/msg00039.html (13,468 bytes)

11. Re: [RFI] Covering Solar Panels To Assess RFI (score: 1)
Author: Tony <dxdx@optonline.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 19:31:29 -0400
It is highly unlikely the panels themselves generate RFI without the optimizers I agree with you Tony. When we informed SolarEdge about the noise disappearing when we covered the panels, they came to
/archives//html/RFI/2020-08/msg00055.html (10,022 bytes)

12. Re: [RFI] Covering Solar Panels To Assess RFI (score: 1)
Author: Tony Brock-Fisher via RFI <rfi@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 08:39:43 -0400
The obvious test would be to disconnect the optimizers from one or more panels, expose them to sunlight, but cover all the rest. This configuration should be quiet. -Tony It is highly unlikely the pa
/archives//html/RFI/2020-08/msg00061.html (10,620 bytes)

13. Re: [RFI] Covering Solar Panels To Assess RFI (score: 1)
Author: Cortland Richmond <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 10:15:58 -0400
Someone at SolarEdge doesnt seem to know that cells are diodes. Cortland -Tony It is highly unlikely the panels themselves generate RFI without the optimizers I agree with you Tony. When we informed
/archives//html/RFI/2020-08/msg00062.html (10,849 bytes)

14. Re: [RFI] Covering Solar Panels To Assess RFI (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 15:50:09 +0000
This could be misleading. In the unlikely event that the panels themselves are generating noise, disconnecting them from the optimizers would remove them from a large length of common-mode radiator.
/archives//html/RFI/2020-08/msg00064.html (11,497 bytes)

15. Re: [RFI] Covering Solar Panels To Assess RFI (score: 1)
Author: <r55stan@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 22:24:28 -0700
I also have trouble accepting the panel noise theory SolarEdge claims. If that were true, why is it that some brands of inverters never cause RFI, yet the same solar panels are used on all solar powe
/archives//html/RFI/2020-08/msg00065.html (12,781 bytes)

16. Re: [RFI] Covering Solar Panels To Assess RFI (score: 1)
Author: KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:34:15 -0700
I also have trouble accepting the panel noise theory SolarEdge claims. Simple enough solution... They spew their BS, in the hope one swallows it whole and wanders away. Response? "Prove it". That usu
/archives//html/RFI/2020-08/msg00066.html (8,959 bytes)

17. Re: [RFI] Covering Solar Panels To Assess RFI (score: 1)
Author: "John K9UWA" <john@johnjeanantiqueradio.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 09:04:14 -0400
Regarding SolarEdge or any other company selling and installing Solar powered equipment. These cases are not the first ones. SolarEdge has fixed others so they are RFI quiet. You can't tell me that S
/archives//html/RFI/2020-08/msg00067.html (11,025 bytes)

18. Re: [RFI] Covering Solar Panels To Assess RFI (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 18:33:00 +0000
I am not sure that I would say that "Solar Edge" believes the panels are noisy. One engineer or installation technician may have said that, but I've never heard that from our high-level engineering c
/archives//html/RFI/2020-08/msg00068.html (9,935 bytes)

19. Re: [RFI] Covering Solar Panels To Assess RFI (score: 1)
Author: KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 14:27:39 -0700
"I would not consider Solar Edge's interaction with ARRL or customers to be "spewing" BS." I'm certain you wouldn't! Waiting with bated breath for the one-service-call-resolution-without-unreasonable
/archives//html/RFI/2020-08/msg00069.html (9,696 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu