Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFI\]\s+pleasant\s+surprise\s+today\s+from\s+Solar\s+Edge\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [RFI] pleasant surprise today from Solar Edge (score: 1)
Author: WW3S <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 01:29:24 +0000
My neighbor across the street had a 21 panel Solar Edge array installed in May 2019, 6.5 kw I believe. I had the 18kc noise spikes, and the 200kc spaced optimizer noise. After working with Paul at th
/archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00139.html (8,890 bytes)

2. Re: [RFI] pleasant surprise today from Solar Edge (score: 1)
Author: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 18:39:35 -0700
THANK YOU PAUL/ED/ARRL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Each time this happens Solar Edge learns a little, and it makes it faster, and simpler for the next Amateur! 73, and thanks, Dave (NK7Z)
/archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00140.html (9,595 bytes)

3. Re: [RFI] pleasant surprise today from Solar Edge (score: 1)
Author: Clay Autery <KY5G@montac.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 20:46:17 -0500
One of the first things I did was to join ARRL as a LIFE member. As for the solar installs.....  I've now seen tons of cases like this where the noisy installation was "fixed" by the installer.... Ju
/archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00141.html (9,347 bytes)

4. Re: [RFI] pleasant surprise today from Solar Edge (score: 1)
Author: Tony <73guddx@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 00:52:38 -0400
James: Solar Edge used the same suppression techniques on my neighbors installation and it only reduced the noise from S-9 +15 db to S-9 which is still very high. I suspect that the suppression would
/archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00143.html (9,629 bytes)

5. Re: [RFI] pleasant surprise today from Solar Edge (score: 1)
Author: <r55stan@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 22:15:37 -0700
If SolarEdge applies their fix and the noise is still too high, it is possible they missed one panel. That happened with one of my neighbors about two years ago. They finally got it right on the four
/archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00144.html (10,573 bytes)

6. Re: [RFI] pleasant surprise today from Solar Edge (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 14:50:28 +0000
We have come a long way, but still have a ways to go. Fortunately, we are dealing with a company that is holding space for all of this and willing to work towards better and better solutions. The ini
/archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00145.html (15,769 bytes)

7. Re: [RFI] pleasant surprise today from Solar Edge (score: 1)
Author: David Eckhardt <davearea51a@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 22:17:14 +0000
This sounds like something the ARRL and W1VLF should be paid for!!! In my small EMC/RFI consulting business, I sure wouldn't be doing this for free!!!!!!! Some limited up-front consulting is in order
/archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00149.html (18,028 bytes)

8. Re: [RFI] pleasant surprise today from Solar Edge (score: 1)
Author: WW3S <ww3s@zoominternet.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 01:44:56 +0000
hes directly across the street from me, all the lots in the subdivision are 80x180 ft, his array is on his rear roof, and my antennas are in my back yard, so 260-285 ft, something like that.... James
/archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00150.html (11,310 bytes)

9. Re: [RFI] pleasant surprise today from Solar Edge (score: 1)
Author: Cortland Richmond <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 23:26:55 -0400
Our problem in such cases is still the Commission's reluctance to enforce the rules against causing harmful interference regardless of the maximum permitted level of emissions. I note that Class A ba
/archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00151.html (9,585 bytes)

10. Re: [RFI] pleasant surprise today from Solar Edge (score: 1)
Author: Tim Tom <73guddx@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 23:57:46 -0400
James: Your antenna is about 150 feet further away compared to the distance between my neighbors solar panels and my antenna. Its about twice the distance so in theory the noise would be 1/4th as str
/archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00152.html (12,819 bytes)

11. Re: [RFI] pleasant surprise today from Solar Edge (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 21:29:43 -0700
That's oversimplified for relatively large sources and short distances. Inverse law (3dB/doubling) may be more applicable. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ RFI mailing lis
/archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00153.html (8,552 bytes)

12. Re: [RFI] pleasant surprise today from Solar Edge (score: 1)
Author: Tony <73guddx@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 15:19:57 -0400
Jim: Thanks for that analogy. Tony -K2MO _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
/archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00154.html (8,414 bytes)

13. Re: [RFI] pleasant surprise today from Solar Edge (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 14:56:31 +0000
It is far from that simple, Cortland. "Enforcement" is a very broad term that can range from the advisory letters routinely mailed by the FCC in response to complaints about harmful interference to t
/archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00168.html (16,816 bytes)

14. Re: [RFI] pleasant surprise today from Solar Edge (score: 1)
Author: "Hare, Ed W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 16:20:00 +0000
Its a little more complicated than that, Dave. ARRL is funded to do this sort of thing and members expect that for their membership dues, ARRL will do what it takes to help ensure as much of a noise-
/archives//html/RFI/2020-09/msg00170.html (21,495 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu