Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+on\s+60\s+Meters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+RTTY\s+on\s+60\s+Meters\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] RTTY on 60 Meters (score: 1): Author: Richard Kriss <aa5vu@att.net>; Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 12:53:05 -0500; Anyone tried RTTY on one of the five 60 meter channels? It is my understanding there is a gentlemans agreement among the 60 meter users that digital ops are on Channel 3 or 5258.5. I would assume thi; /archives//html/RTTY/2017-04/msg00017.html (6,721 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] RTTY on 60 Meters (score: 1): Author: "Thomas F. Giella W4HM" <thomasfgiella@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 14:07:26 -0400; Dick yes virtually all digital modes operation is on channel 3. If you set your VFO on 5357.500 kHz USB-DATA you will be fine. I've personally never printed an RTTY signal on 60 meters, it's mostly J; /archives//html/RTTY/2017-04/msg00019.html (8,043 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] RTTY on 60 Meters (score: 1): Author: Michael Haack via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 13:09:24 -0500; Don AA5AU could probably shed more light on this but,... I recall on thread here a while back that RTTY was not a permitted mode on 60M. Mike WB9B It is my understanding there is a gentlemans agreeme; /archives//html/RTTY/2017-04/msg00020.html (8,404 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] RTTY on 60 Meters (score: 1): Author: Lee Roberts <ham@n0sq.us>; Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 12:14:16 -0600; From ARRL's website: With an eye to the potential for expanded 60 meter privileges in the future, the ARRL believes it is critical to cooperate fully with the NTIA. Therefore, the ARRL asks all amate; /archives//html/RTTY/2017-04/msg00021.html (7,847 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] RTTY on 60 Meters (score: 1): Author: Thom <ki8w@ki8w.com>; Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 19:12:06 -0400; I was under the impression that 60 meters was SSB only. I have never operated on that band for that reason. I am 100% RTTY and CW 73 Thom KI8W On 4/9/2017 14:14, Lee Roberts wrote: From ARRL's websit; /archives//html/RTTY/2017-04/msg00022.html (8,972 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] RTTY on 60 Meters (score: 1): Author: Matthew Pitts via RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 19:17:27 -0400; When it was first made available to hams, it was SSB only; that changed about the same time they changed the power level limit and swapped the one channel that hams were experiencing interference on; /archives//html/RTTY/2017-04/msg00023.html (9,963 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]