The results of these contests are available only from CQ and the New RTTY Journal print editions (May for WW and July for WPX). Plaques for both contests were presented, as is traditional, at Dayton.
Dear Genn, Why are the results not posted on the web ? Many om's all over the world have no CQ or NRJ. And other contests , the results are on the web, or in packet ! 73 Uli, DJ9XB W6OTC wrote:
Hello Uli: This is a decision of the sponsors who are CQ Magazine and The New RTTY Journal. 73, Glenn, W6OTC Dear Genn, Why are the results not posted on the web ? Many om's all over the world have n
Author: W5IUA Robert <robert.schafer@wcom.com> (W5IUA Robert)
Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 12:45:07 -0500
My guess is that part of the benefit of sponsoring a contest is to get = people to buy your magazine to see the results. RTTY -- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts -- multipart/alternative text
Before Dayton there was a discussion about the zone 16 (log checking software) versus zone 17 (logged as sent) issue for some UA9 calls and it's consequences: - recipients got QSOs removed from their
Glenn, just for your information: not all plaques were presented at Dayton. You remember our e-Mails (?) I wanted to pick up the WW-SOABH-plaque for CT9L (DJ6QT). Result: NIL! 73 de Waldemar, DK3VN -
Hi Goetz, NIL .. nothing! Maybe I should post - via the reflector - all my impressions about Dayton-2002; about this and MANY more other issues? Maybe some guys would be very surprised then? But I'll
impressions Gee, I didn't get to talk with Waldemar, but it -looked- like he was having a good time! http://www.qsl.net/wa9als/Dayton_2002/107-0711_IMG.JPG
Is not sponsoring a contest "marketing", no matter who the sponsor? If noone sponsors contests, we are all in big trouble. I was pleased to learn recently that Icom has agreed to sponsor NAQP. If th
Dear Glenn and RTTY-Contesting-group ! Sorry, Glenn, I thought, it's a contest from ham's agains ham's, all over world ( W W is the name ). And not contest-sponsoring for the two magazine. The sponso
I would like to add a few words to John's comments about marketing. I agree with his comments 100%. I bow to any and all contest sponsors and if they feel they need sufficient time to get the results
Would somebody please translate "At uh BOY" for me. My English learned at school and through books doesn't help me. 73 de Goetz dj3iw@t-online.de -- Original Message -- From: "Ron K5DJ" <k5dj@austin.
We had this debate when I was a full member of the RSGB HF Contesting Commitee, that results of RSGB Contests should appear on the Web. Many in the Committee felt that Rad Com being the journal of th
of in We talk about the sport? Please give us the example of sport which announce the results of competition a year after completion was finished and publish it only in special sponsors magazines. 7
In the future when the results are published I'm sure that we can get the results scanned and then post on this reflector since it's difficult to get the magazine in all locations. Ray KG7YQ As in pu
Would it not be possible for CQ Magazine to offer a kind of results service in the form of an acrobat file, sent via e-mail, for say 1 year for the sum of $5 or $10. I think it fair to say - that all
As much as I believe the results should be web-published, that violates the publisher's copyright, unless you have permission. What I believe is a reasonable accomodation to the publishers is that 2
Dear Tom, I agree, at least this could solve the problem. But I have other proposal. Lets give a chance to companies which are in HAM RADIO business, to pay for all expenses for contest in exchange f