Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Rude\s+contesters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Rude\s+contesters\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] Rude contesters (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 17:16:27 -0600; Three times this weekend, I had guys calling on top of the DX when I was trying to hear if he confirmed my report. PLEASE PLEASE let the QSO in progress F I N I S H before dumping your call in. I use; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-09/msg00181.html (6,878 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] Rude contesters (score: 1): Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 19:57:54 -0500; Jim a lot of newbies coming in with the "gotta work DXCC in a day" attitude and as soon as they finish with one mode they move to the next. I don't know what the answer is to the problem, it's a bit; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-09/msg00184.html (9,032 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] Rude contesters (score: 1): Author: "Jim W7RY" <w7ry@centurytel.net>; Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 18:02:34 -0700; Thats a bit over the top dont you think Jim? Here's my take. 1. Its a contest. It's all about ME and MY score. 2. Perhaps I don't hear the DX or can't copy them because of flutter or just plain bad c; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-09/msg00185.html (9,008 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] Rude contesters (score: 1): Author: "k0bx@arrl.net" <k0bx@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 18:09:01 -0700 (PDT); Bigger/taller antenna's and louder amplifier's help solve this problem. Joe K0BX Stop the insanity! Please do not add me to any distribution lists (Joke, Stories or Junk) without my permission. Thats; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-09/msg00186.html (9,378 bytes)
5. Re: [RTTY] Rude contesters (score: 1): Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 18:26:15 -0700 (PDT); So does LISTENING first. But that requires a tiny amount of courtesy and a few extra seconds out of your life. The way RTTY contesters fret about shaving a few milliseconds off their macros, you'd; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-09/msg00187.html (10,656 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] Rude contesters (score: 1): Author: "K. Krallis" <kkrallis@tee.gr>; Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 07:32:15 +0300; The good thing is I caught KD4POJ on a backscatter path for #49 on 10m......only Wyoming remains in hiding :) Ron K0IDT You too? I did work him on September 26 and got confirmation on LoTW. Also WAS; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-10/msg00003.html (6,930 bytes)
7. Re: [RTTY] Rude contesters (score: 1): Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 18:39:57 -0500; I saw some pretty unruly pileups to the likes I had not seen in many years, especially when the J35 showed up with 15 minutes to go to the end on 15 meters. These weren't newbies either. I dropped my; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-10/msg00037.html (7,985 bytes)
8. Re: [RTTY] Rude contesters (score: 1): Author: Alejandro XE1EE <xe1ee@telmexmail.com>; Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 18:59:18 -0500; Hello.. I experienced the same also. And saw while NH2L was calling someone sending Please let him finish the Fu**g QSO".. very rude indeed. 73 to all ** XE1EE Alejandro Valdez O. DXCC RTTY, SSB, CW; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-10/msg00038.html (9,482 bytes)
9. Re: [RTTY] Rude contesters (score: 1): Author: iain macdonnell - N6ML <ar@dseven.org>; Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 17:06:22 -0700; Watch a DXpedition pileup with a waterfall, and any misconception of RTTY ops being polite will vanish quickly. DX gives a report to a complete callsign, and 50 stations all start transmitting immedi; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-10/msg00039.html (7,781 bytes)
10. Re: [RTTY] Rude contesters (score: 1): Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 00:23:56 -0400; I'm beginning to think some of this behaivor is generated from the NOW.....or NEXT....type of operating you see more of now....we use it, but only when we get more than one call from a CQ or TU, not; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-10/msg00041.html (9,320 bytes)
11. Re: [RTTY] Rude contesters (score: 1): Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 08:12:23 +0100; The same happened earlier with PZ5RA. He delivered a real fire-and-brimstone sermon to the unruly mob before going QRT... and even while he was typing, some people were still calling. Again, some of; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-10/msg00044.html (8,627 bytes)
12. Re: [RTTY] Rude contesters (score: 1): Author: "W4GKM" <w4gkm@citlink.net>; Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 09:10:02 -0500; It got so unpleasant for me that I just decided to quit after 9 hours. Just not fun anymore. Nick W4GKM The same happened earlier with PZ5RA. He delivered a real fire-and-brimstone sermon to the unru; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-10/msg00058.html (9,137 bytes)
13. Re: [RTTY] Rude contesters (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 14:48:01 -0700; "packet generated Sunday afternoon pileups are getting as bad on RTTY as they are on SSB !!!!!!" Yeah, and now they are coming out with a RTTY Skimmer. That will be cool when you have 50 stations all; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-10/msg00070.html (7,736 bytes)
14. Re: [RTTY] Rude contesters (score: 1): Author: Ian White GM3SEK <gm3sek@ifwtech.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 07:58:01 +0100; "packet generated Sunday afternoon pileups are getting as bad on RTTY as they are on SSB !!!!!!" Yeah, and now they are coming out with a RTTY Skimmer. I tried a cluster feed from RTTY Skimmer at the; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-10/msg00073.html (9,213 bytes)
15. Re: [RTTY] Rude contesters (score: 1): Author: "Gary AL9A" <al9a@mtaonline.net>; Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 15:36:16 -0800; The same frequency comment forces a comment from me. What frequencies are being used in spots from the new RTTY skimmers? Are they the actual FSK frequency or the frequency readout from a radio runni; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-10/msg00091.html (9,147 bytes)
16. Re: [RTTY] Rude contesters (score: 1): Author: "Ron Kolarik" <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 19:35:09 -0500; Okay try this one, I'm running AFSK and all my spots will be the Mark frequency, that should about cover it. I have problems with the same thing Gary and my biggest complaint are the guys running USB; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-10/msg00093.html (9,168 bytes)
17. Re: [RTTY] Rude contesters (score: 1): Author: "Rick" <RickPalio@att.net>; Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 19:43:39 -0700; You guys just answered a question I have had -- how do some guys, not too many but one or two, answer my CQ's W-A-Y off frequency.. Like in this day and age of digital !! Yea - 40 years ago it was ea; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-10/msg00094.html (10,203 bytes)
18. Re: [RTTY] Rude contesters (score: 1): Author: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 20:03:26 -0700; REPLY: One of the major causes of off-frequency stations is misuse of AFC. A common scenario is this: The S&P station is running FSK but has AFC on. As he tunes across the band and gets near the CQ s; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-10/msg00096.html (10,077 bytes)
19. Re: [RTTY] Rude contesters (score: 1): Author: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>; Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 23:28:22 -0500; Ron I had a few call way off freq 2 or 3 times and like you say the timing was such I was sure they were calling me. I just hit the TX button and type IF your calling me your Way off freq. Normally a; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-10/msg00097.html (12,766 bytes)
20. Re: [RTTY] Rude contesters (score: 1): Author: "Gary AL9A" <al9a@mtaonline.net>; Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 19:33:10 -0800; Bill, Wouldn't the S&P station with his AFC on also affect those running AFSK, not just FSK? 73, Gary AL9A You guys just answered a question I have had -- how do some guys, not too many but one or tw; /archives//html/RTTY/2012-10/msg00098.html (11,257 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]