Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Station\s+upgrade\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+Station\s+upgrade\s*$/: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: "AD5VJ Bob" <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 00:42:01 -0600; Well, slowly I am catching on here. Ok let me ask you this, now that I have monitored the bands all day and have saved many RTTY frequencies to memory, this being a NA contest I have many local (if y; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00333.html (9,994 bytes)
22. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: "Bill Turner" <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 04:01:43 -0800; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ More DX is found between 14080 and 14090 than all the other bands put together. Spend most of your listening time there, but when there is a major DXpedition; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00335.html (9,817 bytes)
23. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 09:46:18 -0500; Don't discount 17 meters. When the band is open, there is usually some sort of RTTY activity there. PSK is also very active on this band. I agree, 40 and 80 are usually dead unless there is a contest; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00344.html (8,503 bytes)
24. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: "Bill Marx" <bmarx@bellsouth.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 10:39:57 -0500; The reason I went with the 756 PRO series (I currently have the PRO lll) was the ability to read RTTY and scan the bands without having to boot the computer or other things. I can listen on the CW po; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00349.html (9,612 bytes)
25. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: "Bill Turner" <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 09:39:41 -0800; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I need to get a beam for 17 meters. Can anyone recommend a decent three-element? Perhaps one combined with 12 meters? 73, Bill W6WRT _________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00352.html (8,343 bytes)
26. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 13:14:12 -0500; I've worked 319 DXCC entities since October 1997 with a lowly G5RV up about 35 feet (10 meters) 73 - Jim AD1C -- Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863 USA +978-251-9933, <j; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00354.html (8,544 bytes)
27. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: "Bill Turner" <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 10:28:59 -0800; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Impressive! I have new respect for my 17 meter dipole. :-) 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.co; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00355.html (8,615 bytes)
28. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 14:08:43 -0500; Outlaw AFSK? Maybe dirty AFSK, but it's the only way to fly AFAIC. S&P in NET/Autotune TX mode saves a lot of time and you are on exactly the right frequency when you answer. How about PSK? You cant; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00361.html (10,790 bytes)
29. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 14:27:49 -0500; What IF is the DSP filtering in? Unless it's in the second, it's at a severe disadvantage to a crystal filter in that stage. I've yet to hear of a ham radio that didn't benefit from crystal filters..; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00362.html (10,183 bytes)
30. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: "Bill Turner" <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 11:31:23 -0800; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you are using a narrow bandwidth - 250 Hz or so - you will be right on top of the other station anyway. If you are, then NET/AFC will only correct a few Hz; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00363.html (8,600 bytes)
31. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: "Bill Turner" <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 11:44:47 -0800; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I have no idea for the IC-746PRO, but it must be the right one because I have never heard the "pumping" so common to poorly designed AGC loops. Works for me.; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00366.html (7,868 bytes)
32. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: "Robert Chudek" <k0rc@citlink.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 13:56:15 -0600; Hello Ty, Call me olde fashioned (I just got my AARP card the other week)... but for RTTY contesting, every radio built should have an FSK mode. One diode, one cap, and a piece of wire... pennies...; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00368.html (12,250 bytes)
33. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: "Tyler Stewart" <k3mm@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 15:05:16 -0500; Uhh, yeah...old fashioned! The diode cap thing went out with the analog VFO! For me that was the TS830...a fine analog radio and the best contest radio of it's decade! Ty K3MM _____ Hello Ty, Call me; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00369.html (12,869 bytes)
34. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>; Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 12:49:06 -0800; Shhhhh! Folks still using the Ten-Tec Omni may hear you. The Omni VI may have a synthesized VFO, but FSK transmit keying is done by switching in and out a 6 pF trimmer from the 9 MHz transmit L.O.'s; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00371.html (8,078 bytes)
35. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: John Becker <w0jab@big-river.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 14:58:14 -0600; Now, now be nice. I still use a Kenwood TS-520 and TS-520SE.. _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00373.html (8,105 bytes)
36. Re: [RTTY] Station upgrade (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 14:57:50 -0800; +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Well, I'm pretty sure I am going to get a new radio and forget the amp for a while. Be nice to have, but if I get an amp, I also have to upgrade everything else; /archives//html/RTTY/2006-02/msg00379.html (8,357 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 36
Page: [1] [2]