- 1. [RTTY] UBN Analysis and Log Checking (score: 1)
- Author: w6otc@garlic.com (W6OTC)
- Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 22:45:04 +0000
- Here are some comments on these issues: First, we should all consider ourselves fortunate that Eddie, G0AZT, is the master log checker in RTTY WW and WPX. Most of you know him and know him to be fair
- /archives//html/RTTY/2002-05/msg00148.html (9,066 bytes)
- 2. [RTTY] UBN Analysis and Log Checking (score: 1)
- Author: eu1sa@belsonet.net (Vladimir V. Sidorov)
- Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 07:34:57 +0300
- Gents, resolution Don't you think, there is something strange? 1. I pick up my UBN report. 1Q with RX9SR and 2Qs with RW9OWD are removed. Bad zones. Fine. Supposingly there should be the same for all
- /archives//html/RTTY/2002-05/msg00155.html (7,952 bytes)
- 3. [RTTY] UBN Analysis and Log Checking (score: 1)
- Author: dk3vn@nexgo.de (Waldemar DK3VN)
- Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 12:42:25 +0200
- Walt, please forget RW9OWD! RW9OWD is CQ-Zone 18. RW9OWD sent 18, I have logged 18 and I got credit for this QSO. But let's take a look on this: In the contest RX9SR sent CQ-Zone 17 instead of 16. Ac
- /archives//html/RTTY/2002-05/msg00156.html (9,643 bytes)
- 4. [RTTY] UBN Analysis and Log Checking (score: 1)
- Author: w7ti@dslextreme.com (Bill Turner)
- Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 06:27:14 -0700
- _________________________________________________________ Fine for you maybe, but what if the other station now realizes his mistake and changes his zone part way through the contest? Or doesn't chan
- /archives//html/RTTY/2002-05/msg00157.html (8,427 bytes)
- 5. [RTTY] UBN Analysis and Log Checking (score: 1)
- Author: sholton@optonline.net (Steve Holton)
- Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 18:09:05 -0400
- We seem to be on the edge of a slippery slope... We should make every effort to ensure we correctly copy the call, exchange etc as sent and log it, unless of course it's wrong then we should?? Make i
- /archives//html/RTTY/2002-05/msg00166.html (7,640 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu