Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+W1AW\/90\s+RTTY\s+and\s+LoTW\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RTTY\]\s+W1AW\/90\s+RTTY\s+and\s+LoTW\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [RTTY] W1AW/90 RTTY and LoTW (score: 1): Author: Richard Kriss <aa5vu@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 15:30:01 -0500; On 6-April-04, W1AW/90 was calling CQ on 15 meters and logging all kinds of QSOs indicating they would QSL via LoTW or direct. I worked them at 1608z and the uploaded the contact to LoTW with the Mac; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00095.html (7,951 bytes)
2. RE: [RTTY] W1AW/90 RTTY and LoTW (score: 1): Author: "Don Inbody" <ad0k@inbody.net>; Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 15:51:49 -0500; W1AW/90 has not loaded any data into LotW. I checked a couple of minutes ago. The last time W1AW loaded anything into LotW was Mar 16. 73, Don Don Inbody/AD0K Buda, TX (EM10bc) QSL via LotW and eQSL; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00096.html (8,397 bytes)
3. RE: [RTTY] W1AW/90 RTTY and LoTW (score: 1): Author: "Ford, Steve, WB8IMY" <sford@arrl.org>; Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 17:16:43 -0400; I was one of the W1AW/90 RTTY operators earlier this week. Although I'm not involved in log management, I believe they will be batch loading them into LoTW on a regular basis. The logging is networke; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00097.html (9,405 bytes)
4. Re: [RTTY] W1AW/90 RTTY and LoTW (score: 1): Author: "dg8lav@arrl.net" <dg8lav@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 23:41:20 +0200; I worked W1AW at 2004-03-08 and i got it confirmend via LotW at 2004-03-13 (5 days later) I think they upload it on a regular basis. 73 de Karl dg8lav ** REPLY SEPARATOR ** __________________________; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00098.html (9,001 bytes)
5. RE: [RTTY] W1AW/90 RTTY and LoTW (score: 1): Author: "Ford, Steve, WB8IMY" <sford@arrl.org>; Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 10:33:06 -0400; I understand, Dick. I'm just like you--in the age of the Internet I expect my contacts to appear in on-line logs ASAP. :-) When I worked 3B9C on phone, the contact appeared in their on-line log withi; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00099.html (9,815 bytes)
6. Re: [RTTY] W1AW/90 RTTY and LoTW (score: 1): Author: Richard Kriss <aa5vu@arrl.net>; Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 11:06:47 -0500; Steve, Thanks for the response. You were doing great and really had a RTTY pile up going. The W1AW/90 is a neat project and will continue to draw attentions. At first I though I screwed up the LoTW u; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00100.html (8,819 bytes)
7. RE: [RTTY] W1AW/90 RTTY and LoTW (score: 1): Author: "Don Inbody" <ad0k@inbody.net>; Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 11:21:48 -0500; Are they QSLing as W1AW or W1AW/90. I can't see that they have uploaded any /90 info on LOTW. 73, Don Don Inbody/AD0K Buda, TX (EM10bc) QSL via LotW and eQSL Steve, Thanks for the response. You were; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00102.html (9,520 bytes)
8. RE: [RTTY] W1AW/90 RTTY and LoTW (score: 1): Author: "Ford, Steve, WB8IMY" <sford@arrl.org>; Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 12:37:16 -0400; Don: The QSLs will use the call sign W1AW/90. For those responding with paper QSLs (with SASE), there will be a special W1AW/90 card. You should see W1AW/90 confirmations appearing in LoTW about a we; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00103.html (10,691 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]