Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+Cabrillo\s+for\s+M\/2\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TRLog\]\s+Cabrillo\s+for\s+M\/2\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TRLog] Cabrillo for M/2 (score: 1): Author: whhendrick@home.com (William Hendrick); Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:44:31 -0600; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_0036_01C0B12A.BECFB500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable How are M/2 identifying; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-03/msg00104.html (9,081 bytes)
2. [TRLog] Cabrillo for M/2 (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree N6TR); Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 09:56:22 -0800; It's in the Cabrillo spec - a number (0 or 1) at the end of the QSO entry. Someone told me this was working with TR - but it has been over a year since I looked at it. You probably need to have the; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-03/msg00105.html (7,895 bytes)
3. [TRLog] Cabrillo for M/2 (score: 1): Author: mikeh@airflash.com (Mike Heideman); Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 10:05:25 -0800; Our NAQP M/2 Cabrillo log submissions were rejected because they didn't include the transmitter number in spite of identifying them as A and B. I ended up resubmitting the logs in the old ARRL format; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-03/msg00106.html (8,912 bytes)
4. [TRLog] Cabrillo for M/2 (score: 1): Author: k1ky@bellsouth.net (Tom Delker); Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 12:44:47 -0600; It worked on my ARRL DX logs (0 for rig A and 1 for Rig B). Was using rig identifiers A & B. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrative reques; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-03/msg00107.html (7,602 bytes)
5. [TRLog] Cabrillo for M/2 (score: 1): Author: rrossi@btv.ibm.com (Ron D. Rossi); Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 14:44:04 -0500; Same for me. But i noticed there was no identifier and submitted a Cabrillo version for each rig on it's own AS WELL as the combined one. -- 73 es God Bless de KK1L...ron (kk1l@arrl.net) <>< QTH: Jer; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-03/msg00108.html (10,068 bytes)
6. [TRLog] Cabrillo for M/2 (score: 1): Author: w2cs@ipass.net (Gary J. Ferdinand W2CS); Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 17:03:34 -0500; This worked for us during the ARRL DX CW, M/2. We assigned a TR identifier to each station (we used L for left and R for right). We also TR-networked the stations so that both stations had log entrie; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-03/msg00110.html (9,514 bytes)
7. [TRLog] Cabrillo for M/2 (score: 1): Author: whhendrick@home.com (William Hendrick); Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 17:41:52 -0600; It must not be working with v 6.57. I just looked at the Cabrillo file and there are no 0/1s indicating TX1/TX2. Here is an example of Cabrillo output for ARRLCW QSO: 28000 CW 2001-02-17 0008 N0NI 5; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-03/msg00111.html (8,909 bytes)
8. [TRLog] Cabrillo for M/2 (score: 1): Author: mikeh@airflash.com (Mike Heideman); Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 16:48:06 -0800; I don't think you're going to be able to do this with POST. You need to track baton-passing where it's actually possible for any of your TX's to be either TX1 or TX2 at any given time. Unfortunately; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-03/msg00112.html (10,680 bytes)
9. [TRLog] Cabrillo for M/2 (score: 1): Author: whhendrick@home.com (William Hendrick); Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 15:49:54 -0600; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_004C_01C0B21E.92818A60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Which version will give; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-03/msg00115.html (9,166 bytes)
10. [TRLog] Cabrillo for M/2 (score: 1): Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree N6TR); Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 14:16:43 -0800; It is specific to the ARRL DX contest - which I believe is the only one the Cabrillo spec mentions this for. Any version that supports Cabrillo does it. Tree -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-03/msg00116.html (7,816 bytes)
11. [TRLog] Cabrillo for M/2 (score: 1): Author: mikeh@airflash.com (Mike Heideman); Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 14:43:33 -0800; The Cabrillo spec also mentions NAQP which TR doesn't properly emit for Multi-2. -Mike, N7MH -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog Submissions: trlog@contesting.com Administrative reques; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-03/msg00117.html (8,546 bytes)
12. [TRLog] Cabrillo for M/2 (score: 1): Author: k5ka@ionet.net (Ken Adams); Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 08:08:40 -0600; We did a Multi-2 for the January NAQP CW contest and the resulting Cabrillo file did not have the tranmitter ID's in the QSO: records. I just submitted a log for each transmitter. I believe we were u; /archives//html/TRLog/2001-03/msg00122.html (7,684 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]