Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+200\s+wpm\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] 200 wpm? (score: 1)
Author: w8au@sssnet.com
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 23:01:30 -0500
100 wpm used to be the top speed for a small percentage of the CW ops. Used to be a California based club with "star" in the name... 7 star? Had to use keyboards to send, but receive was all in the m
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00492.html (8,394 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] 200 wpm? (score: 1)
Author: w8au@sssnet.com
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:22:13 -0500
Did anyone miss the criteria for this competition? The only thing they have to receive is "call signs." No text. You know that there will be at least one number with letters before and after. This al
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00505.html (8,591 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] 200 wpm? (score: 1)
Author: K4IA@aol.com
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:25:35 EST
I downloaded the program and tried it. It is fun. I suspect that speed is the fastest call sign copied in a run as the program keeps track of the best speed you made. There is no way you could type a
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00506.html (6,375 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] 200 wpm? (score: 1)
Author: "n4dsp" <n4dsp@triad.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 16:48:49 -0500
Perry, Dont be such a Downer!! Geez congratulate the guy for this remarkable achievement! Next thing someone will comment that the program does not have real life conditions like qsb, qrm etc. john-n
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00512.html (8,706 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] 200 wpm? (score: 1)
Author: "John Vickers" <wa4tt@nlamerica.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:11:18 -0500
At least its good that young Ops are still interested in morse. With a little luck, we'll still have somebody to work down on our end of the band ! I just hope they won't come back to me at more than
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00513.html (8,980 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] 200 wpm? (score: 1)
Author: w8au@sssnet.com
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:28:22 -0500
John: Did you miss the "smiley face"? No criticism here... Since ole' Ted was the copying champ eons ago, It would be interesting to see what he might think about it. :-) ____________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00516.html (8,872 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] 200 wpm? (score: 1)
Author: "n4dsp" <n4dsp@triad.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 18:03:00 -0500
I sure did miss the smiley face Perry! My apologies. Merry Christmas to you and your loved ones. 73 john-n4dsp _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.co
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00517.html (9,635 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] 200 wpm? (score: 1)
Author: "John" <brazos@rochester.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 14:50:16 -0500
Don't know about you guys , but I have always had the most trouble coping call signs ! John -- Original Message -- From: <K4IA@aol.com> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00521.html (7,822 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] 200 wpm? (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Menzel" <retire@means.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 16:43:50 -0600
And if you think you're pretty good at copying cw...callsigns only...download RufzXP and just TRY IT...it's humiliating! You won't think lightly of the accomplishment after you've had your own ego jo
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00522.html (10,254 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu