Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Display\s+fonts\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Display\s+fonts\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Display fonts (score: 1): Author: sales@tentec.com (Ten-Tec Inc. Amateur Radio Sales); Date: Fri May 23 10:04:58 2003; Hello: Don, I have no idea what you are referring to unless it's the digits used for frequency readout for the display. The fonts and sizes of the characters are exactly the same for the main and sub; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00901.html (10,338 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Display fonts (score: 1): Author: wb8yqj@yahoo.com (Don Rasmussen); Date: Fri May 23 11:37:01 2003; Hi Scott, Yes, it's those digits. As one example, in fig 2. you can see that the number "1" has a base in the sub-display but not on the main display. The disparity of fonts and the placement and ali; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00906.html (9,216 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Display fonts (score: 1): Author: kc4atu@yahoo.com (Bill ROWLETT); Date: Fri May 23 13:10:40 2003; Having worked in the graphic field all my life, I will say that there is nothing wrong with the graphics of the display as presented in the photos on the web site. Is there a difference in the person; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00914.html (9,194 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Display fonts (score: 1): Author: sales@tentec.com (Ten-Tec Inc. Amateur Radio Sales); Date: Fri May 23 13:51:45 2003; We are not looking at the same thing - what "fig. 2" are you referring to? I just reviewed all the pictures in our promotional literature and all the display shots on our website at www.tentec.com/TT; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00916.html (10,292 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Display fonts (score: 1): Author: wb8yqj@yahoo.com (Don Rasmussen); Date: Fri May 23 14:26:38 2003; Hi Scott, Try: http://www.tentec.com/TT565pics.htm The photos are labeled fig. 1, fig. 2, etc. I kind of thought that's where you were headed with this... "looks fine to me, done that way on purpose"; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00920.html (8,454 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Display fonts (score: 1): Author: k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com); Date: Fri May 23 14:56:20 2003; The sub VFO is understandably smaller, so what's the big deal about it being a different font? The differnet fonts tend to separate the frequency displays even more and they are both are easily readi; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00922.html (6,295 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Display fonts (score: 1): Author: wa2pvk@msn.com (WILLIAM MANSEY); Date: Fri May 23 17:09:12 2003; It would be unfortunate, indeed, if someone did NOT purchase an Orion because of the screen fonts. They would be missing out on a great rig! I never bothered looking at the display that closely becau; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00934.html (9,731 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Display fonts (score: 1): Author: w9ac@arrl.net (Paul Christensen, Esq.); Date: Fri May 23 18:49:45 2003; the do FWIW - I have four Ten Tec knobs here: RX-340, Omni Six, 301 Remote, 302 Remote. Not one of them wobbles or has tension problems. -Paul, W9AC; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00946.html (8,555 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]