Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+FS\:\s+Orion\s+565\s+$non\-AT$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+FS\:\s+Orion\s+565\s+$non\-AT$\s*$/: 1501 ]

Total 1501 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [Orion] Question about noise floor (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 14:33:33 -0500; Hi Lee! At 12:54 PM 11/11/03, you wrote: OK, yes the test works exactly as you said it would. I have been experimenting with the AGC threshold values. I understand completely whats happening here. AN; /archives//html/Orion/2003-11/msg00020.html (13,407 bytes)
42. [Orion] Orion as an IF (score: 1): Author: rbeersr@ev1.net; Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 16:15:14 -0600; Has anyone tried their Orion as an IF for use with VHF and UHF transverters? If so, I'd really be interested in your comments. It seems like this rig would be wonderful for weak signal work on these; /archives//html/Orion/2003-11/msg00021.html (6,348 bytes)
43. [Orion] Question about noise floor (score: 1): Author: "BarryG" <n1eu@myway.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 20:51:31 -0500 (EST); Appreciate W4ZV sharing his experience with the Orion AGC. I've read Ten-Tec's excellent articles, and maybe I've missed something, but it seems like a piece of the puzzle is missing. My understandin; /archives//html/Orion/2003-11/msg00022.html (8,258 bytes)
44. [Orion] Question about noise floor (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 07:29:45 -0500; N1EU wrote: The digital AGC does not amplify - a signal will emerge with the maximum gain if the digital AGC applies no compression to it. Barry, I share your confusion about how this works. Note the; /archives//html/Orion/2003-11/msg00023.html (9,305 bytes)
45. RE: [Orion] Question about noise floor (score: 1): Author: "BarryG" <n1eu@myway.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 08:20:10 -0500 (EST); Thanks to Bill and others for informative comments. It seems that although Ten-Tec has made an unprecedented effort at providing technical information on the new rig, the AGC action really hasn't yet; /archives//html/Orion/2003-11/msg00024.html (8,360 bytes)
46. [Orion] Question about noise floor (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:05:26 -0500; the AGC through practice. Very true! I know MUCH more now than I did when I got Orion on August 20, but I still don't understand WHY some of the settings work the way they do, and that still bothers; /archives//html/Orion/2003-11/msg00025.html (8,839 bytes)
47. [Orion] Heil Goldline Mic with ORION - SUCCESS! (score: 1): Author: Kc9cdt@aol.com; Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 09:15:03 EST; OK, I have a Heil Goldline mike with the HC5 as the Narrow element. Called Bob Heil, he sent me a cable for it. Hooked it up, and it works. Have had 3 (so far) QSO's all with great audio reports from; /archives//html/Orion/2003-11/msg00026.html (6,652 bytes)
48. [Orion] Programmable AGC Problem (score: 1): Author: "William H. Hein" <Bill@AA6TT.com>; Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 17:54:58 -0500; I downloaded and installed Orion firmware 1.366 earlier today while I was getting my station ready for Charlie K1XX to use in SS. While checking the various menu parameters afterwards I noticed that; /archives//html/Orion/2003-11/msg00027.html (6,677 bytes)
49. RE: [Orion] Programmable AGC Problem (score: 1): Author: "RM" <kamar@inr.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 18:15:45 -0500; I have the same problem; however, this issue was present in version 1.365 also.... I use the 'programmable' AGC to set the AGC decay to below 80 db/s Ron ....... NU1U I downloaded and installed Orion; /archives//html/Orion/2003-11/msg00028.html (7,490 bytes)
50. [Orion] Programmable AGC Problem (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 23:07:31 -0500; NT1Y wrote: I could not set the Main RX programmable AGC decay below 80 dB/s. Strange Bill...no problem here or with 1.365 either for that matter. Maybe you should do a Master Reset. 73, Bill W4ZV __; /archives//html/Orion/2003-11/msg00029.html (6,704 bytes)
51. RE: [Orion] Programmable AGC Problem (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 00:53:59 -0600; It helps to read the manual. See page 33. The decay setting ranges in SLOW/MED/FAST AGC positions are restricted to values that make sense for those AGC speeds. Programmable AGC is settable over the; /archives//html/Orion/2003-11/msg00030.html (9,773 bytes)
52. RE: [Orion] Programmable AGC Problem (score: 1): Author: "RM" <kamar@inr.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 08:21:52 -0500; Grant, It is all relative; it doesn't have to make sense. What is slow to one may be fast to another. All three AGC variables should have the same ranges.... Ron ........ NU1U It helps to read the ma; /archives//html/Orion/2003-11/msg00031.html (10,582 bytes)
53. RE: [Orion] Programmable AGC Problem (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 09:53:45 -0600; Seems to me there are enough people ALREADY confused about AGC -- at least it makes sense to have a standard point of reference that can't be screwed up too badly. But like I suggest to everyone who; /archives//html/Orion/2003-11/msg00032.html (7,622 bytes)
54. [Orion] AGC (score: 1): Author: john rader <kd5yty@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 13:00:04 -0800 (PST); I have been following the thread on the Orion's AGC, and have found that I would have all AGCs programmable as well as nameable. Since the Threshold is a major factor, it makes since to have the abil; /archives//html/Orion/2003-11/msg00033.html (6,886 bytes)
55. Re: [Orion] AGC (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 15:46:30 -0600; the I tend to be a "simpler is better" guy. Heck ... that's why radios still have knobs ... they're very efficient and natural man-machine control mechanisms. No lists, no names to remember, and you; /archives//html/Orion/2003-11/msg00034.html (6,953 bytes)
56. [Orion] RE: AGC (score: 1): Author: john rader <kd5yty@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 14:05:52 -0800 (PST); Grant, Point well taken, "Simper is better" is why I made this suggestion. Labels usually indicate contents. One size does not fit all band conditions. I have requested this as well from TT. S/1, M/3; /archives//html/Orion/2003-11/msg00035.html (7,148 bytes)
57. [Orion] IC-7800 Discussion Heats Up (score: 1): Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 14:03:12 -0600; The Icom boys have finally gotten initial release dates (Jan) and US price on the 7800 (about $9K, MSRP). And already the "it better do this or that for $9K" comments are starting -- So for those of; /archives//html/Orion/2003-11/msg00036.html (6,660 bytes)
58. [Orion] This is a test (score: 1): Author: "RM" <kamar@inr.net>; Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 20:23:10 -0500; Please Pardon.... I did a dumb thing on my end _______________________________________________ Orion mailing list Orion@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/orion; /archives//html/Orion/2003-11/msg00037.html (6,039 bytes)
59. [Orion] Orion Crashes (score: 1): Author: "BarryG" <n1eu@myway.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 09:31:00 -0500 (EST); Four users reported multiple system crashes here during sweepstakes. Was wondering if this seems to have been fixed? Thanks & 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ No banners; /archives//html/Orion/2003-11/msg00038.html (6,880 bytes)
60. [TenTec] Orion Warmup for CQ WW CW (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 12:10:42 -0500; Decided to warmup using Orion on 10 meters in the LZ DX Contest today, and discovered some interesting settings while making about 120 QSO's (mostly weak EU): Case 1 - some atmospheric noise on the b; /archives//html/Orion/2003-11/msg00039.html (8,070 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]