Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Jupiter\s+selectivity\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Jupiter\s+selectivity\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Jupiter selectivity (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Frank" <jafrank@nyc.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 15:21:30 -0500; Hi All, I need some help in deciding if I want to buy the TenTec Jupiter. I'm looking for a back-up to my Omni 6, opt 1 (which I couldn't be happier with). Work mostly cw, but some ssb also. If I buy; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00287.html (6,864 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter selectivity (score: 1): Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>; Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:05:28 -0800; If you have the right filters in your Omni VI, it will run circles around the Jupiter. The Jupiter can do lots of stuff the Omni VI can't do but the VI wins in the filter department. 73 Rick Hi All,; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00289.html (8,235 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter selectivity (score: 1): Author: "Mike Brown" <k9mi@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 21:13:09 -0000; I was told the receiver in my Omni V was better then the Jupiter. This was by someone who should know. Mike - K9MI _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contestin; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00290.html (8,025 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter selectivity (score: 1): Author: "Toby Pennington" <toby423@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 16:15:06 -0500; The Jup is not a good CW rig......stick with the Omni 6 for CW> Interested in SSB? Then buy the Jupiter as it is good on SSB. Toby W4CAK the _______________________________________________ TenTec mai; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00291.html (9,269 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter selectivity (score: 1): Author: "John Huffman" <hjohnc@adelphia.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 17:15:07 -0500; I've had an Omni V and my other rig is a K2/100. I tend to use the Pegasus most and on CW. The filters at the narrow bandwidths are not steep. The 300hz filter looks like it has about a 3 to 1 slope.; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00296.html (8,071 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter selectivity (score: 1): Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>; Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 21:05:02 -0600; Buy a Paragon II and load it up with filters. It's about the same price as a Jupiter and a much better radio. 73 Bob, K4TAX _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00302.html (10,158 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter selectivity (score: 1): Author: "Denton" <denton@oregontrail.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 19:08:57 -0800; Hi Robert....I got a Paragon II loaded with all the filters.....any tips on the rig? Wonder how well it does on am and fm. -- Original Message -- From: "Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00303.html (11,326 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter selectivity (score: 1): Author: "HUGHESRO" <ROGERH@realtracs.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 21:25:38 -0600; My Jupiter and the argo 5 are the best cw radio's I've ever owned. I hve operated the om-5 in a cw contest several years ago and the cw was great. I work cw only ever nite on Fists freq. I's fb, grea; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00304.html (11,161 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter selectivity (score: 1): Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>; Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 21:27:26 -0600; Tips in what way? I use mine on CW, SSB, AM and FM. It is quite good on CW and SSB as one would expect. As to AM it works nice, just adjust the power in AM mode to 25 to 30 watts output, LSB, and run; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00306.html (9,347 bytes)
10. [TenTec] Jupiter selectivity (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:35:26 +0000; <<<This power level is just about correct for driving a Centurion to legal AM limit of 375 watts carrier.>>> I'd never drive a centurion to 375 w. cxr on AM. It is simply not up to that kind of duty.; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00311.html (8,968 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter selectivity (score: 1): Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>; Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:08:22 -0600; If it is not up to 375 watts on AM then how does one justify the RTTY an SSTV limit of 650 watt limit, 50% duty cycle, 10 minute transmission limit? After all RTTY and SSTV is a carrier mode with 100; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00331.html (11,923 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter selectivity (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 22:27:32 +0000; hi bob, <<<If it is not up to 375 watts on AM then how does one justify the RTTY an SSTV limit of 650 watt limit, 50% duty cycle, 10 minute transmission limit? After all RTTY and SSTV is a carrier mo; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-12/msg00367.html (11,977 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]