Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+OMNI\-D\s+Series\s+C\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] OMNI-D Series C (score: 1)
Author: "Alexander N. Gerli" <ac1wye@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 07:47:08 -0400
Hi folks! Well, something new and different in the shack. I've been licensed since my 'teens (1964). It may have taken a few years (!), but I just got my first Ten Tec xcvr! My OMNI-D is loaded and h
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-08/msg00315.html (7,016 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] OMNI-D Series C (score: 1)
Author: Ralph Arnold <rea.papaof10@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:36:07 -0400
Hi Alex I also have one TenTen Omni D Bought it last July while up in Mich. What a great Receiver low noise floor. I thought it had a weak front end but when I adjusted the ant resonate Gang Busters.
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-08/msg00316.html (8,182 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] OMNI-D Series C (score: 1)
Author: Wade Staggs <tvman1954@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:38:30 -0500
*Good Morning,* * I also am the proud owner of an Omni D rig. The Ten Tec Corsair and Omni D rigs of the vintage 1980's era, are still very impressive transceivers even by todays standards. Recently,
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-08/msg00317.html (9,449 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] OMNI-D Series C (score: 1)
Author: James Boswell <jboswell@nrao.edu>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 11:10:05 -0600
On 8/21/2014 5:47 AM, Alexander N. Gerli wrote: Hi folks! Well, something new and different in the shack. I've been licensed since my 'teens (1964). It may have taken a few years (!), but I just got
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-08/msg00318.html (9,878 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] OMNI-D Series C (score: 1)
Author: Neil Martinsen-Burrell <neilmartinsenburrell@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:18:44 -0500
I am a new ham and my Omni C is just my second transceiver. I may just have low expectations, but coming from my Kenwood TS-520SE the Omni has a number of improvements that I enjoy. For where I am ri
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-08/msg00319.html (10,234 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] OMNI-D Series C (score: 1)
Author: Wade Staggs <tvman1954@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:31:17 -0500
*Just a quickly added note. Accidently leaving the Auto Notch Feature on while in CW Mode can be most frustrating! hi... hi ... We won't be making that mistake again. It is kind of like receiving CW
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-08/msg00320.html (11,032 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] OMNI-D Series C (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 22:41:45 +0200
Ralph, there is a simple explanation of why you need DSP. First the industry builds radios for us with much more sensitivity than we actually need, especially on the low bands, amplifying everything
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-08/msg00321.html (10,860 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] OMNI-D Series C (score: 1)
Author: "R. Eric Sluder via TenTec" <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 17:16:11 -0400
Rick, I agree with your assessment and I appreciate the brick wall variable filtering of dsp. I'm not fond of the dsp NR in the IF based systems. Like you, I've found an external dsp unit does wonder
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-08/msg00323.html (12,990 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] OMNI-D Series C (score: 1)
Author: Al Gulseth <wb5jnc@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 16:38:19 -0500
Eric, Unless you're really scraping the bottom of the barrel in the bank account an Omni B or C series, or a Corsair for that matter, won't set you back very much in current terms. For me the more cr
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-08/msg00324.html (14,531 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] OMNI-D Series C (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tortorella" <w2iy@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 18:17:11 -0400
Several years ago I traded a Collins 75S-1 for an Omni C series D (or is it Omni D series C, I always get mixed up) and I have to say I definitely got the better end of the deal. The Omni is just a w
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-08/msg00326.html (11,876 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] OMNI-D Series C (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jrichards@k8jhr.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 02:50:15 -0400
YES! And... (he said in good humor) in another 20 years, you can upgrade to one of the current crop, and be even more amazed... but until then, ENJOY your new rig !! :-) I am sure it will prove a hug
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-08/msg00328.html (9,440 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] OMNI-D Series C (score: 1)
Author: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:50:12 +0200
How good are they really? (long story) I used one on a big Multi-Multi SSB Contest DX-pedition to Liechtenstein in 1988. See: http://www.dj0ip.de/my-expeditions/hb0csz-1988/ We were divided into team
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-08/msg00329.html (18,207 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] OMNI-D Series C (score: 1)
Author: Brian Carling <bcarling@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 08:14:25 -0400
Bottom line - OMNI D series C is a wonderful $300 transceiver to this day ! Best regards - Bry Carling _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http:/
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-08/msg00330.html (11,162 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] OMNI-D Series C (score: 1)
Author: Wade Staggs <tvman1954@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 13:18:13 -0500
*We recently helped a Friend set up a DDS type VFO on his Corsair. The simple job of plugging it in and selecting External VFO, made this radio a real keeper. I am now wanting the DDS type VFO for se
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-08/msg00335.html (12,938 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu