Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+C\s+on\s+17m\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Omni\s+C\s+on\s+17m\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Omni C on 17m (score: 1): Author: k9ot@mhtc.net (Paul DeWitte K9OT); Date: Sat Aug 16 22:05:06 2003; Without going into too much detail can someone fill me in on the problem with an Omni C on 17m? I seem to remember something about the IF having a problem on 17m. Is this on SSB and CW both? Thanks 7; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00359.html (7,425 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Omni C on 17m (score: 1): Author: geraldj@isunet.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer); Date: Sat Aug 16 23:05:43 2003; There are two problems on 17m with the Omni C. The IF is 9 MHz, so the LO is mixed to 9 MHz also. Twice the LO injection is 18 MHz, twice the IF is 18 MHz, both roar through the mixer to produce spur; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00360.html (7,930 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Omni C on 17m (score: 1): Author: csturner@slonet.org (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Sun Aug 17 00:05:55 2003; Hi Paul - Its not really a problem, but it is a design flaw. Hard to understand that the Ten Tec engineers didn't see it coming though. Since the OMNI-C has a 9 mHz IF, and 17 meters is at 18 mHz, yo; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00362.html (9,115 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Omni C on 17m (score: 1): Author: cpa2000@yahoo.com (Terry O'Neill); Date: Sun Aug 17 09:47:03 2003; To further muddy the waters on this subject, as of August 14, 2003 Ten-Tec's official position was that the Omni C is fine on 17 meters. I sent them an e-mail inquiry on ths very subject and their re; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00363.html (8,501 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Omni C on 17m (score: 1): Author: geraldj@isunet.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer); Date: Sun Aug 17 11:30:21 2003; No, Clark, the first IF of the Corsair is NOT 6.3 MHz. That's only the Bandpass Tuning IF of the RECEIVE IF. The transmit IF is still at 9 MHz as is the first receiver IF and the product detector. Th; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00366.html (8,445 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Omni C on 17m (score: 1): Author: k9ot@mhtc.net (Paul DeWitte K9OT); Date: Sun Aug 17 12:44:01 2003; Thanks everyone for the nice replies. I guess just to be safe I will stay off 17m with it. I had been thinking of taking it with me on vacation and 17m is a must. So will take a different rig Thanks; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00368.html (8,392 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Omni C on 17m (score: 1): Author: w8au@sssnet.com (w8au@sssnet.com); Date: Sun Aug 17 12:55:27 2003; Give Stan the benefit of the doubt.... after all, this rig predates his service at TT and he is, after all, a SALESman. (if he had to keep up with all the engineers and repair guys he would need extr; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00369.html (8,986 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Omni C on 17m (score: 1): Author: cpa2000@yahoo.com (Terry O'Neill); Date: Sun Aug 17 13:46:47 2003; Terry: Give Stan the benefit of the doubt.... after all, this rig predates his service at TT and he is, after all, a SALESman. (if he had to keep up with all the engineers and repair guys he would ne; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00370.html (9,219 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Omni C on 17m (score: 1): Author: winjones@ix.netcom.com (Winston F. Jones); Date: Sun Aug 17 18:16:23 2003; I used to have a Corsair. I could never understand why I had to operate it in the SBR (sideband-reverse) mode switch position to get the proper sideband for 17 meters. All the other bands were O.K. w; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00372.html (9,528 bytes)
10. [TenTec] Omni C on 17m (score: 1): Author: rohre@arlut.utexas.edu (Stuart Rohre); Date: Mon Aug 18 17:00:38 2003; Wasn't that rig designed well before the WARC bands frequencies were known? Pretty hard to predict the future, look at the rigs that had 11m as standard on them in 1957. 73, Stuart K5KVH; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00385.html (8,127 bytes)
11. [TenTec] Omni C on 17m (score: 1): Author: cpa2000@yahoo.com (Terry O'Neill); Date: Mon Aug 18 22:16:10 2003; I received this e-mail today (8/18/03) from Ten-Tec. I was set to buy an Omni C but now I'm conflicted. I really enjoy 17 meters & I love the quiet receiver & QSK of the Omni's. I thought the Omni C; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00391.html (9,214 bytes)
12. [TenTec] Omni C on 17m (score: 1): Author: N4NT_Mike.Hyder@charter.net (Mike Hyder --N4NT--); Date: Mon Aug 18 22:48:30 2003; Here is an email I sent privately to a fellow today. It speaks for itself and I stand by it. ___________________________________ Take a different rig. My Omni-C puts out spurs. Even with the KEY UP,; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00398.html (10,854 bytes)
13. Fw: [TenTec] Omni C on 17m (score: 1): Author: N4NT_Mike.Hyder@charter.net (Mike Hyder --N4NT--); Date: Mon Aug 18 22:59:32 2003; Sorry that the below message is ambiguous. It is on 17 meters that my Omni-C puts out a couple of watts of garbage KEY UP. I have never had any trouble with that rig on any other band. When the Omni-; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00399.html (11,717 bytes)
14. [TenTec] Omni C on 17m (score: 1): Author: geraldj@isunet.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer); Date: Tue Aug 19 00:02:33 2003; The question to ask is:"What sideband is the normal sideband in that radio on 17m?" If its upper sideband there's a big transmit spur. If its lower sideband there's no spur. Its possible that it may; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00400.html (8,879 bytes)
15. [TenTec] Omni C on 17m (score: 1): Author: k9ot@mhtc.net (Paul DeWitte K9OT); Date: Tue Aug 19 12:35:33 2003; To further stir the pot about the Omni C on 17m, I have received several emails from people using them on 17m saying that they were told that they were putting out spurs. T Ts standing is that they a; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00407.html (8,485 bytes)
16. [TenTec] Omni C on 17m (score: 1): Author: wlfuqu00@uky.edu (Bill Fuqua); Date: Tue Aug 19 13:26:40 2003; Interesting question. All radios put out spurs,harmonics, splatter etc. It is a matter of level. An example; years ago I heard a lower sideband signal on the upper part of 10 meters and waited for an; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00409.html (10,573 bytes)
17. [TenTec] Omni C on 17m (score: 1): Author: geraldj@isunet.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer); Date: Tue Aug 19 13:34:41 2003; The spurs come from the second harmonic of the LO and a little from the second harmonic of the IF. The IF is right about 9 MHz and fixed, so that spur stays on 18.0 MHz. The LO injection is 9 MHz + t; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00410.html (8,028 bytes)
18. [TenTec] Omni C on 17m (score: 1): Author: N4NT_Mike.Hyder@charter.net (Mike Hyder --N4NT--); Date: Tue Aug 19 14:55:29 2003; About the strength of the spurs: my Omni-C on 17 meters put out 100 watts key down and 2 or 3 with the key up. Assume best case, the difference between 100 watts and 2 watts of spurs is 17 dB. So the; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00414.html (11,807 bytes)
19. [TenTec] Omni C on 17m (score: 1): Author: RMcGraw@Blomand.Net (Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX); Date: Tue Aug 19 16:42:03 2003; Sounds like the PA is unstable on this rig. Or there is one heck of an amount of feedthrough from a mixer. Stink-o! 73 Bob, K4TAX 2 units tried different merit feasible. splatter very my with there.; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00418.html (12,922 bytes)
20. [TenTec] Omni C on 17m (score: 1): Author: geraldj@isunet.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, electrical engineer); Date: Tue Aug 19 17:53:44 2003; The horse still isn't moving no matter how hard we kick! The shared crystal is for the 10 and 28 MHz bands. In the Omni C the crystal is 4 MHz to mix the 5 MHz vfo to 9 MHz where its second harmonic; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-08/msg00421.html (10,745 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]