Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Y2K\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+Y2K\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Y2K (score: 1): Author: MitchA@pssch.ps.ge.com (MitchA@pssch.ps.ge.com); Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 14:24:03 -0500; I keep hearing that many different types of microchips may be affected with the Year-2000 glitch. I've been thinking about this.....would it affect any of our station equipment? I know that in a cris; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-11/msg00032.html (8,294 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Y2K (score: 1): Author: geraldj@ames.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, P.E.); Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1998 13:40:11 -0600; Is there a clock/calendar in the software? Does it have to have date/time entered after a power reset? Does it DO anything with date and time other than display it? If all of these answer to NO, then; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-11/msg00033.html (8,480 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Y2K (score: 1): Author: Bill_Ames@hyperion.com (Bill_Ames@hyperion.com); Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 14:42:20 -0500; It is a serious problem. Most all those QSLs submitted to the ARRL will no longer count for any awards as the two digit dates on man will not be correct because they won't be able to know the correct; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-11/msg00034.html (8,089 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Y2K (score: 1): Author: geraldj@ames.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, P.E.); Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1998 13:52:20 -0600; Not necessarily. There aren't many hams alive with cards before 1920, and most awards require cards post WW2 and so post 1945. That leaves about 45 years before there's a problem and by then most awa; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-11/msg00035.html (8,213 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Y2K (score: 1): Author: CookTA@corning.com (Cook, Thomas A); Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1998 15:14:48 -0500; Somehow I think that if a little logic is applied to the QSL, solution, it will be very obvious what the real year is. Where we get into trouble is by blindly trusting a fundamentally dumb machine to; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-11/msg00036.html (9,892 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Y2K (score: 1): Author: turner@safety.ics.uci.edu (Clark Savage Turner); Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1998 12:03:24 -0800; Not a likely problem, Mitch. I can think of no place where Ten Tec needs to have a date field in any of their microcode. That would produce a problem. Now, there are ways of counting time (clocks) th; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-11/msg00038.html (8,110 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Y2K (score: 1): Author: k4ldr@sunco.com (Peter J. F. Shaw); Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 16:47:12 -0500; Greetings TenTecers: I read the Y2K piece re DXCC QSLs as a gag. Pretty clever one too. As always, Mr. Phelps, the mission is that ya gotta have some salt handy when surfing and perusing the web/inte; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-11/msg00039.html (8,791 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Y2K (score: 1): Author: reid.w.simmons@intel.com (Simmons, Reid W); Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 13:49:00 -0800; Gee, why worry? Isn't the world supposed to "end" on 1/1/2000? (or is it midnight 12/31/1999?) Reid, K7YX Is there a clock/calendar in the software? Does it have to have date/time entered after a pow; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-11/msg00040.html (9,889 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Y2K (score: 1): Author: seay@alaska.net (Del Seay); Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 13:34:35 -0900; Jeeze, just when things started looking good, too. Now I've gotta start going to church again. So much for SS & CQWW de KL7HF --Original Message-- From: Simmons, Reid W <reid.w.simmons@intel.com> To:; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-11/msg00041.html (8,894 bytes)
10. [TenTec] Y2K (score: 1): Author: peplasters@rockford.com (Paul Plasters); Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1998 17:40:48 -0600; OH man, you mean we have to suffer through all those people that are so self centered that THEIR CARD is more important than ANYTHING else again? Might be a good time to go UHF or higher! 73 Paul WA9; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-11/msg00043.html (9,302 bytes)
11. [TenTec] Y2K (score: 1): Author: talbot@kmrmail.kmr.ll.mit.edu (George Arthur Talbot); Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 12:34:02 +1200 (KST); Faithful Ten-Techies, I have yet a more fundamental problem that I argue with my coworkers continually. Does the new day start at 0000 or 0001. My contention (as I red in my circa 1959 ARRL handbook; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-11/msg00045.html (9,331 bytes)
12. [TenTec] Y2K (score: 1): Author: cait.martin@ibm.net (Caitlyn M. Martin); Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 19:36:30 -0500; Heya, Actually, don't some TenTec rigs have clocks that show the date and are actually microprocessor controlled? What about the Delta II? For those who think Y2K is a scam, I guarantee some disrupti; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-11/msg00046.html (9,233 bytes)
13. [TenTec] Y2K (score: 1): Author: jreid@aloha.net (Jim Reid); Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 15:21:03 -1000; The same can be asked as to actually when does the new century/millennium actually begin?? You must pass, and clear the zero! When counting, in the root 10 system, because we have 10 fingers, you do; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-11/msg00049.html (9,853 bytes)
14. [TenTec] Y2K (score: 1): Author: WO8L@aol.com (WO8L@aol.com); Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 22:06:48 EST; Hi Guys, Well, I hate to admit it but I'm a Y2K consultant working with one of the 20 largest banks in America on mainframe computer issues for the Year 2000. I'm not kidding. Here's my concern. I th; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-11/msg00052.html (8,442 bytes)
15. [TenTec] Y2K (score: 1): Author: geraldj@ames.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, P.E.); Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1998 21:50:58 -0600; I think people ARE Y2K compliant because we know which way is forward in time. The only computer programs with Y2K problems are those that loose sight of that direction when the counter rolls over to; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-11/msg00053.html (8,116 bytes)
16. [TenTec] Y2K (score: 1): Author: geraldj@ames.net (Dr. Gerald N. Johnson, P.E.); Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1998 22:16:40 -0600; There's a really super prevention for Y2K in the Sunrise-Sunset program published in Byte Magazine for July 1981. It not only doesn't have a 2000 problem, it accomodates older calendars and their err; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-11/msg00054.html (8,152 bytes)
17. [TenTec] Y2K (score: 1): Author: kg5u@hal-pc.org (Dale L. Martin); Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1998 07:03:58 -0600; like a 1950s COMPLIANT? Yes, but only if you mistakenly down New York City made picante sauce... Pace Picante Sauce is Y2K compliant! As are round dorito's. Especially when it's all chased by mass q; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-11/msg00057.html (7,891 bytes)
18. [TenTec] Y2K (score: 1): Author: carl.s.hyde@lmco.com (Carl Hyde); Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 08:55:57 -0500; Thats why I'm Collecting Collins equipment right now, No microprocessors, no transistors, no Y2K problems, but they work FB better than any ricebox. Also heat the room up real nice and if you set a c; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-11/msg00059.html (9,357 bytes)
19. [TenTec] Y2K (score: 1): Author: pinskeep@iglou.com (Peter Inskeep); Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 09:46:08 -0500; Not to worry about being Y2K compliant if, and only if, you are sitting in a dimly lit place with lots of people around, holding a glass of water (of any vintage) in one hand and clutching a hand key; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-11/msg00061.html (9,685 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]