Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+radar\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TenTec\]\s+radar\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] radar (score: 1): Author: "Ron Grace" <rjgdag@ntelos.net>; Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 18:50:24 -0400; for a different question,today i got a ticket radar was used,my truck has had both 2 meters and hf radio with 500 watt amp.my question could the rf from the radio cause a bad reading on the radar? af; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00036.html (6,490 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] radar (score: 1): Author: CATFISHTWO@aol.com; Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 19:00:31 EDT; for a different question,today i got a ticket radar was used,my truck has had both 2 meters and hf radio with 500 watt amp.my question could the rf from the radio cause a bad reading on the radar? af; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00037.html (8,244 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] radar (score: 1): Author: "k3hx@juno.com" <k3hx@juno.com>; Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 03:09:19 GMT; NO. Worked for a big city police department for nearly 26 years. Worked on radios and the radar systems. If there was any way RF cold have incluenced the radar gun, some bottom feeding, slime-eating; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00041.html (9,102 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] radar (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 00:59:51 -0400; While RF on HF or 2m is unlikely to affect the radar, it is affected by vibrating objects. In fact, the standard for "calibrating" the gun is a tuning fork held in front of it. Do your antennas vibra; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00042.html (7,708 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] radar (score: 1): Author: "David S.McCallum" <w7sac2@cox.net>; Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 01:01:16 -0500; Well I think the real question is WERE YOU REALLY SPEEDING???, Be Honest. If you were why waste a lot of time on the reflector trying to beat it. If you were not speeding according to you odometer ha; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00043.html (8,732 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] radar (score: 1): Author: "Ron Grace" <rjgdag@ntelos.net>; Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 06:56:06 -0400; thanks to all for advice.3 things come to play 1.yes antennas vibrate at speed my hf antenna is almost 13 feet long. 2.i was going over the limit.my truck was reading 55 and is off by 2 or 3 mph so i; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00044.html (8,710 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] radar (score: 1): Author: "ultrafixedwing@juno.com" <ultrafixedwing@juno.com>; Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 11:51:12 GMT; Radar operator for 30 years and retired last July. We used the K55 radar which is 10.525 gigahertz. Forget it, you can't win. What concerns me is that he wrote the ticket for a 35 zone when it was 45; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00045.html (8,125 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] radar (score: 1): Author: Robert & Linda McGraw K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.Net>; Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 06:53:05 -0500; Highly unlikely. Proving it to the judge would be even more of a challenge. Pay it and "keep on truckin" 73 Bob, K4TAX _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@conte; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00046.html (8,187 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] radar (score: 1): Author: "n4lq" <n4lq@insightbb.com>; Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 08:53:36 -0400; So why did you bring this up in the first place? Echolink not working? Steve Ellington N4LQ@insightbb.com -- Original Message -- From: "Ron Grace" <rjgdag@ntelos.net> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equip; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00048.html (9,944 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] radar (score: 1): Author: CATFISHTWO@aol.com; Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 15:18:45 EDT; I worked in emergency service on the bridges in northern California ( office at the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge) for about 28 years, and I have seen probably and average of 5 accidents per shift; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00056.html (10,015 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] radar (score: 1): Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>; Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 15:31:36 -0400; Fascinating. Can you elaborate on this calibration method. Its nothing I had ever heard about before. Thanks. 73 de Gary, AA2IZ _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list Ten; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00057.html (9,411 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] radar (score: 1): Author: "ultrafixedwing@juno.com" <ultrafixedwing@juno.com>; Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 20:16:55 GMT; We calibrated our K55 radar with two tuning forks. You struck it on a soft surface such as the dash. One was 35 mph and the other was 80 mph. You also had to strike both at once and get the differenc; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00059.html (8,503 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] radar (score: 1): Author: "holladayfd" <holladayfd@multipro.com>; Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 20:00:30 -0500; Not likely--Radar was probably right. The problem was just too much weight on the long skinny pedal. 73, K4VMO -- Original Message -- From: "Ron Grace" <rjgdag@ntelos.net> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00064.html (8,630 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] radar (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2005 17:26:35 -1000; Hi, Radar speed guns use doppler shift to determine the speed of an object that is reflecting a signal back to it. Some (if not all) radar guns use the beat note between the TX oscillator and the inc; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00065.html (9,154 bytes)
15. [TenTec] radar (score: 1): Author: "Dennis O'Connor" <k8do@mailblocks.com>; Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 09:36:05 -0400; 1. You were speeding - so that is not in discussion... The discussion is what should your response be... 2. Do you have any points on your license now? a) If the answer is NO, then the best option is; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00067.html (9,384 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] radar (score: 1): Author: "Wes Attaway (N5WA)" <n5wa@sport.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 19:16:29 -0500; Wouldn't the microwave feed horn act more as aband-pass fileter than as a high-pass filter? Hi, Radar speed guns use doppler shift to determine the speed of an object that is reflecting a signal back; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00074.html (9,870 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] radar (score: 1): Author: "Vic Klein" <vhklein@ptd.net>; Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 09:15:38 -0400; Well, still pretty far OT, but here's the basic concept. The radar units send a radio signal and then read the reflected signal back looking for the difference in the "bounced" signal frequency and t; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00098.html (9,988 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] radar (score: 1): Author: Ken Brown <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 15:42:21 -1000; Horn antennas work over a very broad bandwidth. The low frequency cutoff depends on the physical dimensions. Bigger horns go to lower frequencies. Sort of like a discone antenna. DE N6KB ___________; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00106.html (8,814 bytes)
19. [TenTec] radar (score: 1): Author: <hcawthra@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 15:28:39 -0700; Hello, being new to the list I was wondering when TenTec started making radar units? _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00111.html (7,795 bytes)
20. Re: [TenTec] radar (score: 1): Author: "Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com>; Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 18:36:38 -0000; Isn't there a radar list where this belongs. Do I remember correctly that this thred started because some one wanted to his Orion use to detect rsdsr. ARRL could saythat HAMS do msny good things but; /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00115.html (9,820 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]