Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80m\s+dipole\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+80m\s+dipole\s+question\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] 80m dipole question (score: 1): Author: "Travis Fitzgerald - VE3WO" <ve3wo@rac.ca>; Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 11:27:19 -0500; Hi - Anyone on the reflector this morning? I'm having a small problem with an 80m dipole that I'm raising for CQWW next weekend. Total length of the dipole is 133', but distance from tower to house i; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00571.html (7,475 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] 80m dipole question (score: 1): Author: "A.J. Farmer (AJ3U)" <farmer.aj@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 12:13:43 -0500; The "flattened V" is okay. It does not have to be perfectly horizontal all the way across. Mine does the same thing with a droop of about 6 to 10 feet in the center and it works fine. I have even hea; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00573.html (8,905 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] 80m dipole question (score: 1): Author: "WA3GIN in Alex. City, VA" <wa3gin@erols.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 12:36:35 -0500; That dropping concept in reality works fine. Most of the radiating work is done much closer to the feed point, the first 1/8 wave of wire either side of the feed point. 73, dave wa3gin --Original Mes; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00574.html (9,945 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] 80m dipole question (score: 1): Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 18:42:57 +0100; Why? For what reason? 73 Jim _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free,; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00575.html (8,113 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] 80m dipole question (score: 1): Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 12:44:47 -0500; If the dropping works well, then why can't I select and appropriate length, and feed one side or the other, and create an array of sorts.... Similar to a Half "U" or Lazy H? --Original Message-- From; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00576.html (11,273 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] 80m dipole question (score: 1): Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 18:50:17 +0100; The whole antenna is importand, don´t forget ground losses. Back in the 60:ties people was thinking that a Inv V was better then a dipole, atleast I know better know! 73 Jim -- ________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00577.html (10,894 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] 80m dipole question (score: 1): Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 18:57:42 +0100; Sorry, should be "I know better now", Too fast fingers! 73 Jim -- _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Statio; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00578.html (8,695 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] 80m dipole question (score: 1): Author: "WA3GIN in Alex. City, VA" <wa3gin@erols.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 13:13:14 -0500; At height he is using it's a NVIS antenna...a few feet of droopy elements isn't going to make a noticeable difference in his short skip performance. 73, dave wa3gin The whole antenna is importand, do; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00579.html (12,838 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] 80m dipole question (score: 1): Author: "WA3GIN in Alex. City, VA" <wa3gin@erols.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 13:14:25 -0500; Don't know why you can't get it to work OM. I've got a 3 E 40m beam built that way and it works great...maybe your antenna is installed over a iron ore deposite??? 73, dave wa3gin --Original Message-; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00580.html (12,668 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] 80m dipole question (score: 1): Author: Jan Erik Holm <sm2ekm@telia.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 19:32:48 +0100; True ofcourse, but every dB counts, atleast in my book. If I don´t have to give away dB´s I´m not going to either. 73 SM2EKM -- _______________________________________________ See:; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00581.html (8,131 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] 80m dipole question (score: 1): Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 11:41:18 -0800; Maybe, but EZNEC shows the difference between his two arrangements to be about .2 db at most! k7puc True ofcourse, but every dB counts, atleast in my book. If I don´t have to give away dB&acute; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00582.html (9,860 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] 80m dipole question (score: 1): Author: "WA3GIN in Alex. City, VA" <wa3gin@erols.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 14:49:49 -0500; Sure...the time you spend trying to squeeze a db out you could work 100 stations...play more squeeze less! 73, dave wa3gin True ofcourse, but every dB counts, atleast in my book. If I don´t hav; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00583.html (9,892 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] 80m dipole question (score: 1): Author: "WA3GIN in Alex. City, VA" <wa3gin@erols.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 14:50:58 -0500; Gee, a theoretical .2db...that theoretically could amount to how many missed contacts - .001, haha 73, dave wa3gin --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-bounce; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00584.html (10,687 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] 80m dipole question (score: 1): Author: "Travis Fitzgerald - VE3WO" <ve3wo@rac.ca>; Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 15:33:12 -0500; Hello Towertalkers - Just wanted to drop a note to say Thanks+40dB for all of the responses to my query. The dipole is up, with the end of the house leg dropping vertically for about 4 feet (my estim; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00585.html (11,998 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]