Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+dumbing\s+down\.\.\.extra\s+class\s+test\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] dumbing down...extra class test (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 20:07:51 -0400
This is somewhat dated, but I took the extra exam and the first class radiotelephone exam on the same day, at the FCC office in NYC. Extra in the morning, as a warmup for the first. As it turned out,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00642.html (7,814 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] dumbing down...extra class test (score: 1)
Author: "J.P." <jp@ezoom.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 21:30:19 -0700
I sure don't, but I do remember sitting in one of those rickety wooden chair/desk combos down on Varick St. some 25+ years ago and sweating the code for the General exam. W2XX/7 _____________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00650.html (7,504 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] dumbing down...extra class test (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 08:17:27 -0400
phone. passage My uncle, who freely admits he is an appliance op who knows nothing at all about radio, failed the extra theory time and time again in the 60's and 70's. Without being active or worki
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00658.html (8,053 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] dumbing down...extra class test (score: 1)
Author: "R. Kevin Stover" <rkstover@mchsi.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:06:32 -0500
As an ARRL VE, and one who took and passed the pre-2000 extra class test, I can state in no uncertain terms the that ALL of the current theory tests for any class license are easier than they were in
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00666.html (8,879 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] dumbing down...extra class test (score: 1)
Author: N4BAA - JOSE CASTILLO <n4baa@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:31:57 -0400
Kevin, SIR!..You are AB-SO-LUTE-LY correct...and to some degree it burns my "insulators" discussing this...I normally don't "chime" in when I don't have an out right solution...but.. I was licensed i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00673.html (10,382 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] dumbing down...extra class test (score: 1)
Author: "Thomas Beltran" <tbeltran@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:39:57 -0700
"It's just a little embarrassing to wander across an antenna conversation in the Extra portion of 20m and notice that nobody involved knows the formula for a half wave dipole or quarter wave vertical
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00674.html (12,133 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] dumbing down...extra class test (score: 1)
Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:58:57 -0400
Part of the problem is that the older hams want to have nothing to do with the younger kids - there is no mentoring at all. In many cases, it is outright hostility. The older, more experienced hams t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00675.html (15,134 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] dumbing down...extra class test (score: 1)
Author: SavageBR@aol.com
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:19:02 EDT
I hate to reopen the CW bag of worms, but I must mention, In the late 50's I failed my first extra class test because I made two mistakes SENDING 20 wpm CW with the Tampa FCC office hand key. Thirty
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00676.html (8,687 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] dumbing down...extra class test (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Gehring" <steveg@mtaonline.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:22:44 -0800
Tom, Yes, I want engineering types on the "Extra Class" portions of the bands. I do not want to converse about radio-related subjects with someone who doesn't have that capability. I am selective --
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00677.html (14,673 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] dumbing down...extra class test (score: 1)
Author: "D. Scott MacKenzie" <kb0fhp@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:33:12 -0400
Are only people with Engineering Degrees from ABET accredited schools worthy of having a Ham license?; or is that people with only P.E. license, M.S. Engineering, or Ph.D. in Engineering? Only in Ele
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00678.html (9,480 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] dumbing down...extra class test (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Shauger" <rgshauger@myyellowstone.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:35:58 -0700
I believe you will find the "outright hostility" you speak of may come from the other side of the aisle as well. The impatience of a "NOW" generation can make being a good mentor a real challenge. Bo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00679.html (17,961 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] dumbing down...extra class test (score: 1)
Author: "John Geiger" <ne0p@lcisp.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:41:58 -0000
Hi Steve, Nice to see you on the reflector. Isn't it amazing that we both passed that "impossible" cw test before graduating from High School? I couldn't agree more, though. The extra class license i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00680.html (17,358 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] dumbing down...extra class test (score: 1)
Author: "R. Kevin Stover" <rkstover@mchsi.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:46:18 -0500
There are few very basic things that, IMHO, all Hams should know. The basic antenna formulas, basic AC-DC theory, acceptable operating practices, FCC rules and regs. Nope, the guys who had to sit in
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00681.html (10,784 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] dumbing down...extra class test (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:52:28 -0700
I think we should change the topic of this thread to something less controversial like religion or politics :):) Steve, K7LXC please stop this thread, or I will be forced to post my recently composed
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00683.html (19,829 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] dumbing down...extra class test (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:09:22 -0400
of may come from "NOW" generation nothing to do with many cases, it is tend to exclude the impatience, long hair, Read page 60 of the August QST. Packet, Pactor, and NVIS There we find an example of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00684.html (11,176 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] dumbing down...extra class test (score: 1)
Author: "Buck - N4PGW" <n4pgw-list2@towncorp.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:24:48 -0400
I'll leave out the reference to the girl as she is apparently a bright kid tutored well in electronics from an early age, not some kid who decided to read a book and take the exam. As for the genera
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00685.html (11,340 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] dumbing down...extra class test (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 13:04:54 -0700
grey And has been since the days of Socrates, at least. I am reminded of a report of the meeting of the Alpine Club (in London) where the idea of admitting women as proposed. "Rather death" was the r
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00687.html (11,313 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] dumbing down...extra class test (score: 1)
Author: "Buck - N4PGW" <n4pgw-list2@towncorp.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:15:44 -0400
Nothing personal to the lawyer and his comments, but being a lawyer, he should understand the rules: FCC Part 97 .1 == The rules and regulations in this Part are designed to provide an amateur radio
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00690.html (19,547 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] dumbing down...extra class test (score: 1)
Author: "Gregory O'Neal" <goneil@tds.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:15:12 -0400 (Eastern Standard Time)
I'm gonna be a critic here for just a moment. First of all, I fail to see the relation here of this discussion to towertalk. I know, I'm not the moderator, and could really care less either way. But
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00691.html (10,604 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] dumbing down...extra class test (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on Tower talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:27:26 -0400
To hobbies, or at least they are to me, where I seen the extablished help and guide the new comers are Aviation and Amateur Radio. Certainly there are those in either who do not and they are sometime
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00692.html (10,645 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu