Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Info\/experience\s+with\s+TS790A\s+and\s+IC820H\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Info/experience with TS790A and IC820H (score: 1)
Author: sprinkies@excel.net (Todd and Sandy Sprinkmann)
Date: Wed Aug 13 12:11:17 2003
Thanks to those who replied with info about the IC471A. I'm going to let that rig pass me by. I am curious about any opinions or experience any of you have with the Kenwood TS-790A and the Icom IC-82
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-08/msg00040.html (8,463 bytes)

2. [VHFcontesting] Info/experience with TS790A and IC820H (score: 1)
Author: kharker@cs.utexas.edu (Kenneth E. Harker)
Date: Wed Aug 13 12:33:20 2003
In my limited experience, the Yaesu FT736R is really deaf. The Yaesu FT726R, despite being an older radio, has a much better receiver. It is, however, older, more likely to need attention, it lacks c
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-08/msg00041.html (10,004 bytes)

3. [VHFcontesting] Info/experience with TS790A and IC820H (score: 1)
Author: tree@kkn.net (Tree)
Date: Wed Aug 13 14:02:38 2003
I have been using the FT736R for 144, 222 and 432 work for a few years now. While a common complaint is that they are deaf, I must say that a large part of this is just that the front end gain is pr
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-08/msg00043.html (9,263 bytes)

4. [VHFcontesting] Info/experience with TS790A and IC820H (score: 1)
Author: wa1hco@adelphia.net (jeff millar)
Date: Wed Aug 13 23:59:44 2003
I've owned a TS-790A since it came out. On 2m it runs with a 13 el Cushcraft at 90ft and on 70 cm it with a 13 el K1FO at 90 ft, fed with 7/8 inch hardline. Both bands perform about the same. I can g
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-08/msg00045.html (9,697 bytes)

5. [VHFcontesting] Info/experience with TS790A and IC820H (score: 1)
Author: k1whs@worldpath.net (David Olean)
Date: Thu Aug 14 09:40:30 2003
Tower mounting preamps can get you into trouble. At low freqs, (below 432 usually) they can be avoided. Comparing a modern version DEM transverter and good modern HF radio with a Yaesu 736 is like in
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-08/msg00047.html (11,990 bytes)

6. [VHFcontesting] Info/experience with TS790A and IC820H (score: 1)
Author: jhawk@MIT.EDU (John Hawkinson)
Date: Thu Aug 14 10:04:53 2003
David Olean <k1whs@worldpath.net> wrote on Thu, 14 Aug 2003 at 14:40:04 +0100 in <00d901c36269$92dcfc30$37c07f3f@DGL28221>: Our experience at W1XM, high up in RF noisy Boston (albiet with a 736R), is
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-08/msg00048.html (8,731 bytes)

7. [VHFcontesting] Info/experience with TS790A and IC820H (score: 1)
Author: mhoffman@microwavedata.com (Hoffman, Mark)
Date: Thu Aug 14 10:28:27 2003
Folks, I'm actually with Dave on this one. In my station, all preamps 2-432 are located in the shack, with feeder losses < 1dB on each. Until I'm ready for EME, where I WILL be putting it on the towe
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-08/msg00049.html (10,667 bytes)

8. [VHFcontesting] Info/experience with TS790A and IC820H (score: 1)
Author: kharker@cs.utexas.edu (Kenneth E. Harker)
Date: Thu Aug 14 10:55:15 2003
It's worth pointing out that N6TR is in a local environment where he is probably far less likely to find really strong nearby signals crunching his receiver than someone operating on a hilltop in W1.
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-08/msg00051.html (9,908 bytes)

9. [VHFcontesting] Info/experience with TS790A and IC820H (score: 1)
Author: wa4kxy@bellsouth.net (Jim Worsham)
Date: Fri Aug 15 12:42:15 2003
I have to agree with Dave. In my experience IF you have a good low loss feedline and IF you have a good receiver (transverter/HF rig combo) and IF you are not trying to do something like EME with a r
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-08/msg00058.html (13,753 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu