Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+RTTY\s+Questions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+RTTY\s+Questions\s*$/: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] rtty questions (score: 1): Author: JDY18@aol.com (JDY18@aol.com); Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 09:59:39 EST; I managed to get WriteLog figured out enough to work some qso's in the RTTY roundup. It works pretty well for strong, clear signals - not so well for weaker or qrm'd signals. Logic would strongly sug; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-01/msg00051.html (7,283 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] rtty questions (score: 1): Author: tom.branch@qth.com (Tom Branch); Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 09:50:42 -0600; Jay, VOX works...what more can one say? Have you tried setting the VOX Gain a little lower, perhaps there's some time of noise on the audio line that is holding the VOX open. If you decide to keep ru; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-01/msg00052.html (7,448 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] RTTY Questions (score: 1): Author: "Bob Naumann - N5NJ" <n5nj@gte.net>; Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 22:41:02 -0600; I've spent a couple of hours messing around, and made 59 qsos in the BARTG contest with Writelog, MMTTY, my ProII @100w and a G5RV laying on my roof. Not bad. So far, everything seems to work fine, e; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00237.html (7,556 bytes)
4. RE: [WriteLog] RTTY Questions (score: 1): Author: "Don Cassel" <doncassel@compuserve.com>; Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 07:26:04 -0500; Bob, Two comments, The scrolling of Rttyrite is intentional so that the call you may be trying to click on does not move up a line just when you are clicking. Hitting a moving target can be rather ch; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00238.html (9,675 bytes)
5. RE: [WriteLog] RTTY Questions (score: 1): Author: "Eric - VE3GSI" <ve3gsi@sympatico.ca>; Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 07:31:40 -0500; Hi Bob, I will leave the RigBlaster questions to someone more familiar with that hardware then me. I have a PRO and prefer using the FSK features of the rig over an audio injected signal. This has be; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00239.html (9,371 bytes)
6. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY Questions (score: 1): Author: "WA9ALS - John" <ham_reflectors@wa9als.com>; Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 07:32:00 -0500; Now there's a fresh idea! <$5 with 3 components too. You could sell the Rigblaster on Ebay... make it stop doing what ever it does where when it fills up the screen, it goes back up to the top. I don; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00240.html (7,669 bytes)
7. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY Questions (score: 1): Author: "Bob Naumann - N5NJ" <n5nj@gte.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 07:00:56 -0600; John, I sure do read that way, but I make the choice of when the page turns - not the book! If some people prefer this "feature", that's fine, but I totally dislike it. It's unnerving to see the lett; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00241.html (10,450 bytes)
8. RE: [WriteLog] RTTY Questions (score: 1): Author: "Bob Naumann - N5NJ" <n5nj@gte.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 07:10:04 -0600; Hi Don & others: Thanks for your responses. Regarding the timed CQ - why is it's functionality different for rtty? The value there for CW is the "wait interval". Why not have it the same for rtty? Re; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00242.html (11,552 bytes)
9. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY Questions (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <wrt@dslextreme.com>; Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 05:46:04 -0800; _________________________________________________________ RTTY by WF1B works this way, and I found WriteLog's method to be a great improvement. I'd suggest just giving it a try; once you get comforta; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00243.html (7,678 bytes)
10. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY Questions (score: 1): Author: "Bob Naumann - N5NJ" <n5nj@gte.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 08:22:34 -0600; Thanks to everyone for the encouragement to stick with the rttyrite scrolling. I'll hang in there with you guys for sure. Now, onto my "rigblaster" situation. The thing that threw me, was that I had; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00244.html (10,527 bytes)
11. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY Questions (score: 1): Author: "Tony Osman" <tony.osman@sympatico.ca>; Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 10:45:53 -0500; Mmmmm, Bob, your comments on using the Rigblaster are interesting. I spent some time yesterday with Peter, VE3HG, trying to setup his RigBlaster Pro for FSK operation. I found that the RigBlaster Pro; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00245.html (12,210 bytes)
12. RE: [WriteLog] RTTY Questions (score: 1): Author: Marty Tippin <martyt@pobox.com>; Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 10:05:51 -0600; At 07:10 AM 1/25/2004, Bob Naumann - N5NJ wrote: Hi Don & others: Thanks for your responses. Regarding the timed CQ - why is it's functionality different for rtty? The value there for CW is the "wait; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00246.html (9,834 bytes)
13. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY Questions (score: 1): Author: "WA9ALS - John" <ham_reflectors@wa9als.com>; Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 11:09:01 -0500; does not make rttyrite do ptt on Com4. What I had to do, is leave the settings for LPT1 alone, and add that Com4 is a CW port in my Writelog port setup, and contrary to my logic, have no port select; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00247.html (9,026 bytes)
14. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY Questions (score: 1): Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 11:21:49 -0500; I believe Bob is using the "regular" version of the Rigblaster and thus using AFSK. The PLUS version has a vw/fsk keying interface built in. The regular version needs to have the internal jumpers con; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00248.html (10,359 bytes)
15. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY Questions (score: 1): Author: "Tony Osman" <tony.osman@sympatico.ca>; Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 11:24:24 -0500; John, I believe that the rig is being keyed for Bob by his having the LPT set for PTT. Tony, VE3RZ This port is for _______________________________________________ WriteLog mailing list WriteLog@cont; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00250.html (9,717 bytes)
16. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY Questions (score: 1): Author: "WW3S" <ww3s@zoominternet.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 11:47:09 -0500; And thats probably the problem...the rig is being keyed via command from the radio control portion rather than being keyed by the rigblaster which will invoke PTT thru the mic cable... for my in ____; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00252.html (10,557 bytes)
17. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY Questions (score: 1): Author: "Jim McDonald" <jim@n7us.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 10:03:06 -0700; I found that my RIGblaster Pro would work fine with FSK and CW from the same port except Writelog which wanted the ports to be different or I had to disable the unused one. Now wanting to reconfigure; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00254.html (14,287 bytes)
18. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY Questions (score: 1): Author: "Bob Naumann - N5NJ" <n5nj@gte.net>; Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 12:57:44 -0600; That's right. The rig was being keyed by my LPT port setup (which bypasses the rigblaster direct to the rig), and the Rigblaster was not being keyed by the RS-232 port, despite having it selected in; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00257.html (10,981 bytes)
19. Re: [WriteLog] RTTY Questions (score: 1): Author: "Dean M. St. Hill" <dsthill@cbcbarbados.bb>; Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 15:49:17 -0400; Just a thought, Since there are no contests that use both FSK and CW why not simply CHANGE the configuration depending on the contest in question. I use Writelog for voice keying, cw and rtty with th; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-01/msg00259.html (18,315 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]