Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ct\-user\]\s+CT\s+DOS\s+Users\s+Check\s+your\s+Log\s+times\s+for\s+WPX\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. [ct-user] CT DOS Users Check your Log times for WPX (score: 1)
Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 23:48:02 -0400
Hi: After using CT DOS V10 for the CQ WPX contest I found all of my times were off by +1 Hour. ie: My first QSO was at 00:33Z, but was logged as 01:33Z. While had patched my computer for the new DST
/archives//html/CT-User/2007-03/msg00036.html (6,637 bytes)

2. Re: [ct-user] CT DOS Users Check your Log times for WPX (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 04:29:09 -0000
Why not set your computer to G.M.T. ..??.. MAL N7MAL BULLHEAD CITY, AZ http://www.ctaz.com/~suzyq/N7mal.htm Hi: After using CT DOS V10 for the CQ WPX contest I found all of my times were off by +1 Ho
/archives//html/CT-User/2007-03/msg00038.html (7,885 bytes)

3. Re: [ct-user] CT DOS Users Check your Log times for WPX (score: 1)
Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 02:21:06 -0400
Setting your clock to GMT is like using "Rubber Gloves for Leaky Fountain Pens"!!! Every program I have (20 year old DOS programs included) has provisions for compensating for the "TIME ZONE" offset
/archives//html/CT-User/2007-03/msg00039.html (10,091 bytes)

4. Re: [ct-user] CT DOS Users Check your Log times for WPX (score: 1)
Author: "N7MAL" <N7MAL@CITLINK.NET>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 06:51:08 -0000
There is absolutely no reason not to set your computer to GMT. The overwhelming majority of hams only need an accurate time stamp for 2 reasons, contests and master logbook. Both of which require GMT
/archives//html/CT-User/2007-03/msg00040.html (10,842 bytes)

5. Re: [ct-user] CT DOS Users Check your Log times for WPX (score: 1)
Author: "Robert Naumann" <w5ov@w5ov.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 07:37:18 -0500
The truth is that when you use your computer for other purposes besides contesting, keeping its time on your local time zone is more convenient. I think that if one needs to use a DOS program such as
/archives//html/CT-User/2007-03/msg00042.html (12,459 bytes)

6. Re: [ct-user] CT DOS Users Check your Log times for WPX (score: 1)
Author: "ct-user-owner (K1EP)" <ct-user-owner@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:34:34 -0400
There are plenty of reasons for anyone to set their computer to whatever time zone they want. The purpose of the list is not to chastise a user, but to help with the problem. You haven't helped solve
/archives//html/CT-User/2007-03/msg00044.html (14,042 bytes)

7. Re: [ct-user] CT DOS Users Check your Log times for WPX (score: 1)
Author: "Robert A. Wilson" <n6tv@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:27:49 -0700
Bob, CT_TOOLS for WinXP <http://www.k1ea.com/ct10/ct_tools.zip> or CT Tools for DOS <http://www.k1ea.com/ct10/ct_dos_tools.zip> should fix the problem for logs made with CT Version 10. Those on CT Ve
/archives//html/CT-User/2007-03/msg00045.html (10,487 bytes)

8. Re: [ct-user] CT DOS Users Check your Log times for WPX (score: 1)
Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 02:33:39 -0400
MAL: First, I didn't call you any names, I just didn't agree that your solution was acceptable for todays applications (or yesterdays) !!! I don't know why you have a bone to pick with Hans, his opin
/archives//html/CT-User/2007-03/msg00046.html (20,112 bytes)

9. Re: [ct-user] CT DOS Users Check your Log times for WPX (score: 1)
Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 02:38:51 -0400
Hi Ed: Thank you for getting things back on track. I guess that there must be a reason for the name of "Bullhead City" !!! My intent of my original massage was to alert the CT DOS users of a possible
/archives//html/CT-User/2007-03/msg00047.html (16,401 bytes)

10. Re: [ct-user] CT DOS Users Check your Log times for WPX (score: 1)
Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 02:39:58 -0400
Hi Ed: Thank you for getting things back on track. I guess that there must be a reason for the name of "Bullhead City" !!! My intent of my original massage was to alert the CT DOS users of a possible
/archives//html/CT-User/2007-03/msg00048.html (16,132 bytes)

11. Re: [ct-user] CT DOS Users Check your Log times for WPX (score: 1)
Author: Ed K1EP <k1ep.list@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 04:28:21 -0400
You can also use numbers, such as SET TZ=4 or SET TZ=7 In this case, what you have to do is manually set the variable twice a year. As pointed out, this may be tricky if the time change occurs during
/archives//html/CT-User/2007-03/msg00051.html (10,819 bytes)

12. Re: [ct-user] CT DOS Users Check your Log times for WPX (score: 1)
Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 07:36:09 -0400
This is an interesting situation. My understanding is that DOS gets time from the BIOS. I doubt any BIOS or DOS have been patched with the new DST rules. If your computer is set to local time, you pr
/archives//html/CT-User/2007-03/msg00052.html (9,865 bytes)

13. Re: [ct-user] CT DOS Users Check your Log times for WPX (score: 1)
Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 03:37:02 -0400
Very interesting for the "Dark Ages" of the DOS OP System !!! After doing a little research, "DOS TIME" was based on GMT only, thus the need to include the Time Variable "SET TZ= EST?EDT" (or whateve
/archives//html/CT-User/2007-03/msg00054.html (11,409 bytes)

14. Re: [ct-user] CT DOS Users Check your Log times for WPX (score: 1)
Author: "John Bednar" <k3ct@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 06:09:57 -0400
Bob, Were you using CTDos with WinXp when you had this time problem? John k3ct@verizon.net _______________________________________________ CT-User mailing list CT-User@contesting.com http://lists.con
/archives//html/CT-User/2007-03/msg00055.html (8,652 bytes)

15. Re: [ct-user] CT DOS Users Check your Log times for WPX (score: 1)
Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 20:34:16 -0400
Hi John: No, I'm using WinME. I've been running every of CT DOS under it with out problems. I don't know what to expect from CT DOS when I'm forced to use WinXP or Vista. TNX es 73 Bob, K1VU ________
/archives//html/CT-User/2007-03/msg00056.html (8,993 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu