Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Open\s+Logs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Open\s+Logs\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Open Logs (score: 1): Author: RKILE@delphi.com (RKILE@delphi.com); Date: Sat Oct 15 13:34:56 1994; While there are many reasons of interest to open contest logs for public review there are several reasons to maintain them as private. If one so likes to leave the cat out of the bag and give away op; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-10/msg00068.html (18,691 bytes)
2. Open Logs (score: 1): Author: aa2du@netcom.com (aa2du@netcom.com); Date: Tue Oct 18 11:19:50 1994; Hi Kurt, nice to see meail from you here on CQ-Contest! Since you brought it up, any chance we can exchange CQWW-CW logs from 1993? Looks like it was a real close one!! What are your plans for the WW; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-10/msg00074.html (7,560 bytes)
3. Open Logs (score: 1): Author: ames@force.DECNET.LOCKHEED.COM (ames@force.DECNET.LOCKHEED.COM); Date: Tue Oct 18 12:17:37 1994; I don't know if this a factor worth considering in the discussion, but but I was under the impression that the people who help with scores thought they had a thank-less job to begin with. If you want; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-10/msg00075.html (10,476 bytes)
4. Open Logs (score: 1): Author: ae327@lafn.org (Richard Norton); Date: Tue Oct 18 22:01:45 1994; Re K1VR's comments on open logs - There are two reasons why people oppose open logs: 1) Entrants have things in their logs that they don't want anyone to see. This can include: a) logging errors b) c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1994-10/msg00077.html (9,507 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]