Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+DX\s+Window\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+DX\s+Window\s*$/: 146 ]

Total 146 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: ken.d.brown at verizon.net (Ken Brown); Date: Fri Jan 24 06:06:41 2003; Hi all, Just because CQ magazine has removed the DX window from the contest rules does not require that we fill that space up with incessant CQs and 200 mile QSOs. Let's try to keep the window clear; /archives//html/Topband/2003-01/msg00201.html (6,639 bytes)
2. Topband: DX Window (score: 1): Author: aa7bg@3rivers.net (Matt); Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 13:01:38 -0700; I guess I haven't been reading the news well enough. Just why, when, and how did the DX window dissapear? I did exactly as suggested below and tuned right over those W/K stations who were CQing in th; /archives//html/Topband/2002-12/msg00165.html (8,026 bytes)
3. Topband: DX Window (score: 1): Author: dandypoint@cox.net (Don); Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 08:10:31 -0500; Fellow DXers, I have a serious concern about the 1830 to 1835 window. I used to work a lot of DX in the 60's and early 70's where the DX = window was clearly 1825 to 1830. There were good reasons to; /archives//html/Topband/2002-12/msg00187.html (8,278 bytes)
4. Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: bazley@iinet.net.au (Michael Bazley); Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 08:35:45 +0800; Hi All, I have no problem with USA stations or anyone working in the DX window...PROVIDED they are working DX. Seasons greetings, 73 es dx de Mike VK6HD; /archives//html/Topband/2002-12/msg00202.html (6,282 bytes)
5. TopBand: DX window (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 10:02:26 EST; << Thanks to all the "guns" who stayed clear of the window so us "l'il pistols" could work some of the DX. It was great hearing all the familiar calls and working many of them, >> Much nicer if opera; /archives//html/Topband/1999-02/msg00004.html (7,269 bytes)
6. TopBand: DX Window (score: 1): Author: 104117.3104@compuserve.com (Robert g. Flory); Date: 28 Nov 96 11:30:13 EST; This window is poorly defined and confusing. As it is worded there seems to be nothing wrong with US or EU stations calling CQ in the window for DX. That practice is defeating of the purpose which is; /archives//html/Topband/1996-11/msg00427.html (8,462 bytes)
7. TopBand: DX Window (score: 1): Author: btippett@CTC.Net (Bill Tippett); Date: Thu, 28 Nov 1996 17:32:29 -0500; Ladies and Gentlemen: I've asked Rob to clarify his question since it is not clear whether it is the ARRL 160 or the CQ 160 contest he is referring to. Since opinions on DX Windows are like derrieres; /archives//html/Topband/1996-11/msg00433.html (7,326 bytes)
8. TopBand: DX window (score: 1): Author: 104117.3104@compuserve.com (Robert g. Flory); Date: 28 Nov 96 20:29:29 EST; My proposal is that in both contests W/VE and EU should not call CQ in 30-35. The ramifications are slightly different for each contest . The main thing is that the definition should be changed to de; /archives//html/Topband/1996-11/msg00435.html (7,822 bytes)
9. TopBand: DX window (score: 1): Author: nx1g@top.monad.net (Craig Clark); Date: Fri, 29 Nov 1996 08:26:05 -0600; or not. Dear friends, Last time I refused to get into this and 8JI chided me for my reticence. I can't hold back this time though. re #2. several years ago, in the CQ 160 test, I was harrased for qu; /archives//html/Topband/1996-11/msg00437.html (8,727 bytes)
10. Fw: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 10:15:15 -0500; Why? If you are submitting a log, you should definitely NOT use packet. But I do not plan to submit my log since I just operated casually, and I spotted many stations for other casual ops that might; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00234.html (7,377 bytes)
11. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: "Josep" <ea6bf@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 18:36:26 -0000; Bill et others, I agree with you all in the case supposed, and I don´t want to give callsigns here, but if you checked the clusters you sure find spotters that later won a plaque, firsts in the; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00242.html (7,644 bytes)
12. Topband: dx window (score: 1): Author: "linda doyle" <ldoyle@gwi.net>; Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 13:58:15 -0600; Hi People, In my humble opinion,unless fcc with input from arrl doesn't come out and make a hard and fast rule defining the "DX WINDOW" what ever that may be we are constantly going to be at odds whe; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00243.html (7,152 bytes)
13. Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 18:13:18 -0500; callsigns here, but if you checked the clusters you sure find spotters that later won a plaque, firsts in their category (?!). How do you understand this..? I cann´t..! Josep, as in life in gen; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00247.html (7,551 bytes)
14. RE: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: "John Kaufmann" <jkaufmann@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 20:49:20 -0500; Bill is 100% correct. I can assure you cheaters eventually get "discovered", certainly by their fellow hams if not by the contest committees, no matter how clever they think they are. The top-notch c; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00250.html (8,314 bytes)
15. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: "Ford Peterson" <ford@cmgate.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 21:11:19 -0600; ...SNIP... Cheating is also like bending the rules playing solitaire. It turns a game with the challenge of the "hunt" and strategy into a procedure for sorting cards. Pretty boring...and zero challe; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00252.html (7,473 bytes)
16. Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: Ron Feutz <feutz@wctc.net>; Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 22:32:54 -0600; Topbanders, A window is absolutely vital to me. Under usual conditions, with the auroral oval cutting off most EU and JA DX, I need a place to go and see if anything is coming thru. In the Stew, US s; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00253.html (7,851 bytes)
17. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: "on4kj" <on4kj@skynet.be>; Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 11:01:37 +0100; hello All, Human behaviour does not change despite claimed HAM SPIRIT. As long we can really recognise " friend or foe ", there is no harm any way. Just a long way to go and create HAM SPIRIT. In my; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00256.html (9,338 bytes)
18. Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: Craig Clark <jcclark@prexar.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:36:01 -0500; First of all, the key is if DX CQ's in the "window" they have to QSX OUT of the window. Secondly, the FCC will never mandate a "DX window." Good DX on 160 to all in 2004! At 11:32 PM 12/28/2003, you; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00262.html (8,937 bytes)
19. Re: Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: Ron Feutz <feutz@wctc.net>; Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 11:03:17 -0600; Not sure how anything you say applies. It is expected, and has been common practice forever, for NA stations to call and work DX on their calling frequency in the window, unless the DX specifies othe; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00266.html (9,849 bytes)
20. Topband: DX window (score: 1): Author: Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@vitelcom.net>; Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 15:40:32 -0400; Ron, During a Contest banning NA DX stations from the DX-window would not only be detrimental to the having more none NA DX-multipliers giving everyone, none DX NA and none NA DX a better chance to w; /archives//html/Topband/2003-12/msg00272.html (9,706 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]