Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Topband\s+INactivity\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Topband\s+INactivity\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Topband INactivity (score: 1): Author: "Diane and Edward Swynar" <deswynar@xplornet.ca>; Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 08:38:18 -0500; Good Day All, Is it just my singular imagination here, or has general activity on 160-meters declined significantly in the past few weeks...? With the exception of contests, the number of CW stations; /archives//html/Topband/2011-03/msg00000.html (6,299 bytes)
2. Re: Topband: Topband INactivity (score: 1): Author: Greg - ZL3IX <zl3ix@inet.net.nz>; Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 06:08:39 +1300; Hi Eddy, I would say that activity has been fairly normal, but propagation has been above average, especially over the CQ 160 SSB test. My log book has far more entries in it than for any other year; /archives//html/Topband/2011-03/msg00001.html (6,889 bytes)
3. Re: Topband: Topband INactivity (score: 1): Author: "Wayne Mills" <n7ng@bresnan.net>; Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 10:19:55 -0700; Hi Eddy, I would say that activity has been fairly normal, but propagation has been above average, especially over the CQ 160 SSB test. My log book has far more entries in it than for any other year; /archives//html/Topband/2011-03/msg00002.html (7,647 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]