Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Topband\:\s+Transceiver\s+for\s+160\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Transceiver for 160 (score: 1)
Author: Bruce Osterberg <n9bx@mchsi.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:00:19 -0500
Since being New to this Reflector and not looking at too many of the past posts, I would like to know, which transceiver that people would recommend for 160 meter DX Use? I must admit I am confused b
/archives//html/Topband/2007-10/msg00074.html (6,946 bytes)

2. Re: Topband: Transceiver for 160 (score: 1)
Author: VE6WZ_Steve <ve6wz@shaw.ca>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:52:29 -0600
You should consider a **good** used FT-1000d: For low-band dx-ing I have owned: FT-1000d (three of them) IC-746 IC-756proII IC-7800 What remains on the desk is the FT-1000d, and the IC-7800. The FT-1
/archives//html/Topband/2007-10/msg00075.html (7,617 bytes)

3. Re: Topband: Transceiver for 160 (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:35:39 -0700
In order of increasing cost: The TS850, a vintage radio with excellent performance can be had at a bargain price used. It lacks a separate RX antenna input, but that can easily be added with a mod th
/archives//html/Topband/2007-10/msg00076.html (8,156 bytes)

4. Re: Topband: Transceiver for 160 (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 07:23:22 -0400
"...I would like to know, which transceiver that people would recommend for 160 meter DX Use?" ** Well, if you're into vintage stuff, I'd heartily recommend a good, used Icom 751A transceiver -- it's
/archives//html/Topband/2007-10/msg00079.html (8,191 bytes)

5. Re: Topband: Transceiver for 160 (score: 1)
Author: VE6WZ_Steve <ve6wz@shaw.ca>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 07:46:14 -0600
that would be but Hi Cecil: I forgot to mention that I have also owned a FT-1000MKV and found the APF to be mostly in-effective. Sold the radio after 1 year. I have had a number of questions about t
/archives//html/Topband/2007-10/msg00083.html (9,527 bytes)

6. Re: Topband: Transceiver for 160 (score: 1)
Author: "EP Swynar" <gswynar@durham.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 09:59:25 -0400
On 9th October, Chet wrote... "...W8JI is using some R4C's and his web site shows the mods he made to it." ** Hi Chet, Well, if the R4C is good enough for Tom, I'm sure it'll be MORE than adequate fo
/archives//html/Topband/2007-10/msg00084.html (8,588 bytes)

7. Topband: Transceiver for 160 (score: 1)
Author: doktorij@bellsouth.net
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:07:57 +0000
I'm sure I'm not the only one, but I swear by my Elecraft K2. Great performance, easy to fix (if needed), great support... Will advise on the K3 as soon as mine arrives, hopefully will be on the air
/archives//html/Topband/2007-10/msg00085.html (7,016 bytes)

8. Re: Topband: Transceiver for 160 (score: 1)
Author: <kolson@rcn.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 10:44:17 -0400 (EDT)
Best I have used on 160 is Icom 781. But suspect K3 and Orion 2 may be better yet. Kevin K3OX _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.
/archives//html/Topband/2007-10/msg00087.html (7,664 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: Transceiver for 160 (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:19:16 -0400
Nothing against the Inrad roofing filter mods but do the W8JI noise blanker mod first (it involves moving one resistor). You may find that the IMD issues are due to IMD generation in the noise blanke
/archives//html/Topband/2007-10/msg00088.html (8,430 bytes)

10. Re: Topband: Transceiver for 160 (score: 1)
Author: n4is@bellsouth.net
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 18:02:34 +0000
Hi Guys I'm using my IC7800 and since firm, V2.1 there is a huge improvement on the APF. The trick is to move the center of the APF to the edge of the RF BW and not in the center. My commun sets are
/archives//html/Topband/2007-10/msg00091.html (8,872 bytes)

11. Topband: Transceiver for 160 (score: 1)
Author: Bruce Osterberg <n9bx@mchsi.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 19:40:30 -0500
Thanks very much for all of the Wonderful comments on the different rigs out there. And also the links to Tom's site and his reports on several of the rigs we all seem to be using. I have an FT-1000M
/archives//html/Topband/2007-10/msg00092.html (7,552 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: Transceiver for 160 (score: 1)
Author: "George (K8GG) & Marijke Guerin" <gmguerin@voyager.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:11:29 -0400
Eddie Swynar replied: ... snip... Other good Icom radios are the IC-765 and IC-740 which has a band switch, instead of switching diodes. I wish I had never sold my IC-740. BTW, there were problems wi
/archives//html/Topband/2007-10/msg00094.html (9,117 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu