| To: | <amps@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [AMPS] Re: |
| From: | gdaught6@leland.Stanford.EDU (George T. Daughters) |
| Date: | Wed, 20 May 1998 09:03:49 +0008 |
hi all,
> Transforming 100 j+0 ohms to 100k j+0 ohms by a single reactance is
> seemingly a bit of a
> stretch.
it looks like a snap to me! i've got no resistance ("0"), a pure
reactance (+j100 ohms). i want to go straight out the +imaginary
axis from 100 ohms to 100k ohms. so, i add an inductor in series
with the existing 100j + 0 that has a reactance of j99.9k (+0); the
total is now j100k + 0, isn't it? i used a "single" reactance to
transform the given impedance to the desired impedance. i think that
one was too easy... what am i missing?
73,
George T. Daughters, K6GT
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/ampfaq.html
Submissions: amps@contesting.com
Administrative requests: amps-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-amps@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [AMPS] Re: Parasitics, Tom Rauch |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [AMPS] Re: Parasitics, Tom Rauch |
| Previous by Thread: | [AMPS] Re:, Rich Measures |
| Next by Thread: | [AMPS] Re:, Ian White, G3SEK |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |