Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] [BULK] - DIN stands for....?

To: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Subject: Re: [Amps] [BULK] - DIN stands for....?
From: "m.ford" <k1ern@direcway.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 07:44:15 -0500
List-post: <mailto:amps@contesting.com>
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Turner" <dezrat@copper.net>
To: "Steve Thompson" <g8gsq@eltac.co.uk>; <amps@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 7:04 AM
Subject: Re: [Amps] [BULK] - DIN stands for....?


> On Sunday, February 26, 2006 12:00 AM [GMT+1=CET],
> Steve Thompson <g8gsq@eltac.co.uk> wrote:
> <snip>
>> Personally, I like D types. OK - it's a pain making the panel hole,
>> but even low cost ones are decent connectors. Pay a few pennies more,
>> and you get something really nice.
>>
>> Steve
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Couldn't have said it better myself. D-sub is good if you want to spend the 
> money for the punch. I haven't yet.
> 
> 73, Bill W6WRT
> 
> _______________________________________________


Some of the mil stuff I've worked on used various D-sub connectors
that incorporated a few coaxial pins in the array. I have not seen these
on the civilian side.
 
Perhaps the robotics guys have some interesting connectors.

Mike  k1ern

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>