| To: | Amp Reflector <amps@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Amps] Design VS parasitic |
| From: | "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com> |
| Reply-to: | dezrat1242@yahoo.com |
| Date: | Mon, 24 Aug 2009 02:09:11 -0700 |
| List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 01:49:18 -0400, Roger <sub1@rogerhalstead.com> wrote: > >Wouldn't it be correct to say (paraphrasing): Designing a circuit to >prevent parasitic oscillations rather than designing one to deal with >the results of one? REPLY: Yes. 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] parasitic oscillation techniques, Alex Eban |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Amps] parasitic oscillation techniques, Bill, W6WRT |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Design VS parasitic, Roger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Design VS parasitic, Carl |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |