Coulda had something to do with the fact that the patent, on one of
the most stable substances known to man, which was heavier than air,
was running out, as well. A very large company held that patent. I'm
not a chemist, so I don't know what the truth really is.
73, Alek
VK6APK
At 05:52 PM 3/03/2010, Dave White wrote:
>I don't think that the point of banning R12 was anything to do with
>toxicity. It was because freons allegedly depleted the ozone
>layer. Maybe you should have frozen Al Gore?
>Cheers
>Dave G0OIL
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: "Bob Moody" <bob@vanirmail.com>
>To: ka4inm@tampabay.rr.com; "amps" <amps@contesting.com>
>Sent: 02/03/2010 06:39
>Subject: Re: [Amps] WD-40 Is Not....
>
>Back before the EvilEmpire took away our Freon 12, I was reading quietly one
>night when a motion in the bookcase caught my eye. Not certain what it was,
>I grabbed a cylinder of R-12 and a 6 foot hose from the shop and dashed back
>in the house. Gave a couple of 10 second bursts above and behind the books
>and upon unstacking, lo & behold, there was a chipmunk! A frosty white hard
>chipmunk. Set him out on the porch. A minute later he convulsed, shook all
>over, then stood up and ran off! And who says Freon is toxic?
>
> Bob K7IRK
>
>
>
>
>
>[truncated by sender]
>_______________________________________________
>Amps mailing list
>Amps@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
http://www.qrz.com/db/vk6apk
http://www.qrz.com/db/vk6py
_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
|