To: | Amps@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [Amps] Good engineering |
From: | "Gary Smith" <Gary@ka1j.com> |
Reply-to: | Gary@ka1j.com |
Date: | Wed, 24 Mar 2010 12:53:50 -0400 |
List-post: | <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com> |
> On 24th March, Bill wrote: > > "...A good engineer will just meet the requirements without going > overboard..." Second hand experience here but my best friend/Best Man at my wedding decided he needed a sit down job subsequent to construction injuries and went to college in St. Louis to study Engineering. He immediately ran into a philosophical disagreement with the head of the engineering department who was one of his instructors. What he found at issue was that instructor's contention that good engineering was to design so that the item would last for the length of the warranty plus one day. I remember his anger and disgust at that concept and he refused to accept that mentality & with that he withdrew from the engineering program and started his own business. Still angers him 25 years later. Gary KA1J _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list Amps@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [Amps] ripple in B+ supply, Ron Youvan |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [Amps] 30-L1 available, gdaught6 |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Good engineering, Bill, W6WRT |
Next by Thread: | Re: [Amps] Good engineering, Edward Swynar |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |