Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

[Amps] Fwd: Linear Amplifier Tuning---PROPERLY!

To: <amps@contesting.com>
Subject: [Amps] Fwd: Linear Amplifier Tuning---PROPERLY!
From: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 08:47:07 -0800
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 12:21:42 -0500
From: jeff millar <wa1hco@wa1hco.net>
Subject: Re: [Amps] Fwd: Linear Amplifier Tuning---PROPERLY!

Here's more about IMD than you may want to know...

I used to work with very low IMD amplifiers for the cellular industry and spent 
a lot of
time studying IMD sources and means of control.  I learned the most about the 
causes
of IMD from a PhD thesis, and later book, by Joel Vuolevi...

     http://herkules.oulu.fi/isbn9514265149/

Most literature describes Intermodulation distortion as coming from harmonics 
of 
the
fundamental mixing with the main signal.  3rd order IMD means

     2 x fundamental +/- 1 x fundamental.  (2+1 = 3rd order)

But, the total contribution to the IMD also comes from 3 F +/- 2F, 4F +/- 3F, 
etc up to
the 9th harmonic and beyond.  All those products stack up on the same frequency
at the output.

## The spacing between tones on a simple 2 x tone will also be the spacing 
between
each tone and all IM products.  IE: tones are 1000+ 1500 hz.  IMD-3 will then 
be 500 hz
above the high tone..and 500 hz below the low tone.  IMD-5 will be 500 hz 
above/below
the IMD-3 products etc. 


Each of these products has a phase and the resulting IMD depends on how all the
phases line up.  This can make the IMD level very sensitive to the test signal, 
power level,
temperature, bias, etc.  It also can make the high and low side IMD have 
different levels.


##  The  2 -tone test is flawed. It's a static test, and all the power 
supplies, like bias,
B+, screen V, etc, are all in a  steady state. Start talking instead, on SSB, 
and now you can
toss in lousy B+ regulation, and ditto with screen + bias regulation.  that 
just screwed up your
load line right there.  Then the big kicker is ALC.  Notice how  commercial 
marine/aircraft SSB
radio's  don't even have a mic gain control !   The ALC meter's  in most 
yaesu's, per the service manual,
are supposed to be aprx 10 db at full scale ALC.    I have 4 x yaesus's  and 
they vary from 5-10db. None
of em appear to be calibrated.  Trying to hook up ALC  between the xcvr and the 
amplifier is another mess. 
That's like trying to close the barn door after the horse has bolted. Then you 
have yet anothert problem. The
time constants in the ALC in the linear amp will not be the same as the ALC 
time constants in the xcvr. A lot
of the older amps  don't even have adjustable ALC.  



The FCC recognizes this effect and mandates that RF transmitter tests uses a
random modulation to measure IMD, so the testers don't tweak the test to find a
sweet spot in IMD performance where some of the components cancel out.

 
## agreed. 2 x tone testing is no longer used just for that reason.  You could 
always  tweak the spacing between the 2 x tones...and  find a spacing that will
minimize IMD.  IF you used  say 100 or 200 hz tone spacing, like 1400+ 1600 hz, 
then
most of your IMD-2-5-7 will then be IN band IMD.    If on the other hand you 
used really
wide tone spacing, like say 100 + 3100 hz, then ur IMD-3-5-7  will all be out 
of band.

##  Rob Sherwood  tried another approach..and used  white noise into the xcvr's 
mic 
jack.   Then look at the resulting IMD.  He then measures the total imd, end to 
end BW..at the
-45 db points.  The typ Icom is 10 khz wide at the -45 db points when tested 
that way. The
new yaesu 5000, in Class A mode is only 3.5 khz wide, also fed with white 
noise.  Although
the white noise doesn't dynamicly test power supplies, it's an easy test to do, 
and results
are always repeatable between same models  of xcvr's.   Most Xcvr's  are  7-8 
khz wide,
at the same -45 db points, when fed with white noise. As can be seen, the 
yaesu's  Class A,
are aprx 1/3 the BW of your typ Icom xcvr.   




The level of harmonics and their phases in the output matching network affects
the total resulting IMD.  But it's nearly impossible to design for or control 
all those effects.  Every matching and bias network presents a different 
impedance at all 
those harmonics.

Most UHF power transistors designed for very low IMD (-50 dB) have an output 
match
specification that is _NOT_ the same at the optimum power transfer match.

###  Moot point anyway on SSB.  This isn't FM.   With SSB, your power output 
will
vary  from 0-max pep output..and everything in between.   Your resulting  load 
Z  will 
then vary from optimum  at full pep output...... to  no where near optimum..at 
low 
levels.  You can see this on a scope, just looking at a xmas tree pattern. 




So, the optimum IMD setting of the tune capacitor is _probably_ not peak power 
output but there's not enough information available to set it...and it would 
drift 
around anyway.


##  whoa.  This is not a SS amp, with fixed xfmr ratio's that never seems to be 
optimized
for anything.    Again , with SSB, the po will vary from 0- 1500w pep.  The 
best we can do is
to tweak the tune for max out, then slightly over couple the load cap.   Plan B 
is to adjust the
linear's  tune+ load control  for max output at say 1700w pep out [apply more 
drive to do this],
then back off the drive, so the amp is normally driven to just  1.5 kw pep out. 
  If it's a real linear amp,
it should be linear from zero to full power output.   It would be easy to test 
your concept out though,
just look at the SA, while cranking the tune control 1st to one side,CW.... 
then to the other side,CCW.   





The biggest contributor to IMD is the amplifier going into compression on 
peaks.  This
produces a nonlinear input vs output response and those non-linearities produce 
the
harmonic mixing effects that create IMD.

 
##  whoa.  Nobody is operating a  tube type linear amp anywhere near it's 
compression point.





The shape of the compression curve affects the level of IMD.  A curve with a 
sharp break
has more IMD than a more gradual curve.  As a guess, a more heavily load 
amplifier
will have a softer compression curve and produce less IMD when driven into 
compression.
A heavily loaded amplifier limits on current and a lightly loaded amp limits on 
voltage swing.
Intuitively, voltage clipping seems "sharper" than current limiting.

The cellular industry implements predistortion of the input signal to 
compensate for
amplifier compression.  The amplifier compression curve bends down, so the 
predistortion
circuit bends the the gain curve up to compensate.

###  The swiss ADAT ham xcvr  uses pre-distortion. 





The future of amplifiers for _should_ include an IMD monitoring circuit and 
predistortion.
This would produce significantly more power with a smaller and more efficient 
amplifier.

## it wouldn't be any more eff.... just less imd.   But if it's cheap to 
implement,
then go for it. 



IMD levels should be set to about -40 to -50 dB. This would have to apply to 
both
transceivers and amplifiers, because much of the IMD these days comes from the
crummy amplifiers in the transceiver.

Crowded bands would seem completely different if everybody's IMD dropped 10-20 
dB.

## agreed,  but you don't have to resort to exotic techniques like  
pre-distortion to get
good imd these days.  this is all old news.  Ham gear, TX wise is pure junk, 
plane and simple.
You use a 300w PA, say like the old MRF-422 used in the yaesu 767GX.. [ and 
also used in the yaesu 1000-D]
The 767GX has -40db pep  IMD3. It runs at 100w pep.   the 1000-d  uses the same 
final devices... but at 200w. 
Take any 1000-D..and reduce the power to just 100w pep out..and eff drops to 
36%.  Now throw in your 
pre-distortion techniques...and you could probably get the IMD3  from -40db pep 
 down to -55db pep on a 
properly designed radio.  Then no  Class A required. 

##  if u want low ind + good eff, you have to back the power way down to almost 
a 1/3 of the rated max output.
You also need max device voltage applied for best imd.  Then u have to design 
the output xfmr around the 100w
power level... for max eff. 

##  Like other's have said many times before, ham gear on TX should meet the 
ITU specs for TX imd, then we would not be
having this discussion.  All the marine and Aircraft meet ITU specs for TX imd. 
  And none of em use pre-distortion techniques nor
Class A  blast furnace tricks.  100 w pep out, in Class A  would never work on 
something like a sailboat anyway, you would kill
the battery in no time at all.   

Later... Jim   VE7RF



jeff, wa1hco

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>