Amps
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Amps] preserving tubes

To: amps@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] preserving tubes
From: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 19:49:13 -0400
List-post: <amps@contesting.com">mailto:amps@contesting.com>
On 10/4/2012 4:16 AM, ian@ifwtech.co.uk wrote:
If a tube has leakage to air, it is doomed anyhow, and storing it in a
vacuum can only delay the inevitable. Leakage will start right in
again when the tube is put into service.

True, but:

The military used to get 4CX150s in vacuum packed cans.
Lets say a tube with metal to glass seals like the 4CX150, or PL172 has an expected vacuum life of 15 years. If you have a bunch of NOS (in the cans) that are 30-40 years old when you open the can the tube is starting its life in the real world with an expected life of 15 years, while one that was never in a can is most likely gassy without ever having been used. OTOH that gassy tube is highly unlikely to be at atmospheric pressure inside, so if you place it in a hard vacuum the difference between inside and out is not great and the tube is unlikely to ever return to a high vacuum. At least not within a practical time. IE the difference between 1 X 10^-5 and 1 X 10 ^-7 Toor or atmospheres is miniscule compared to 15 psi (atmospheric pressure) and 1 X 10^-5 Toor.

Too bad we didn't vacuum pack all those spare PL172s when they were new. They'd be worth a small fortune now.


73

Roger (K8RI)


_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>