On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 14:44:41 -0500, Barry wrote:
>I think it's bad advice and rude, and here's why:
>
>Let's say I'm trying to copy a weak UA9 who answered my CQ. Fred
>comes along and does a short CQ. A loud DL answers him. He doesn't
>notice the weak UA9 sending his call for the third time to me, and
>doesn't hear me saying QRL on backscatter through the loud DL. He
>makes the QSO and is ready for another call, still not knowing he
>just usurped a frequency in use. I lost my opportunity to work the
>UA9 and now have to start saying QRL QRL or CQing in Fred's face to
>try to push him off my freq.
>
>If he did a "QRL?" or just "?" all I need to do is respond with a
>quick "R" rather than have the need to defend my frequency and lose
>the QSO in progress. Maybe it's different on the west coast...
_________________________________________________________
Point well taken, but I've used Fred's method for years (RTTY) and I
don't think that scenario has ever happened. If someone (the original
frequency owner) jumped in with anything such as QRL, CQ or anything
at all, I would disappear quick.
The more I think about it though, the more I like the question mark,
or maybe two or three on RTTY.
I appreciate the comments. I'll give it a try during the next
contest.
--
Bill W6WRT
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.5.2 - Release Date: 12/13/2004
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|