On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 13:08:16 +0000, Keith Kerr wrote:
>I have been known to do this sometimes. I actually recall a few years ago
>(but apologies if I am misquoting him here) Fred, K3ZO , an operator whom I
>much admire and respect, saying this was what he did and it struck me as
>being reasonable idea if the first CQ was a short one. Sometimes a QRL? or
>SSB equivalent will not get an immediate reply on a busy frequency if the
>occupant is trying to copy a difficult exchange. Guess it's all a matter of
>balance...........
>Keith GM4YXI (GM7V)
_________________________________________________________
It was Fred, K3ZO, who recommended a short (emphasis on short) CQ
instead of QRL?. I thought it good advice then and still do now.
--
Bill W6WRT
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.5.2 - Release Date: 12/13/2004
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|