CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] The battle of the callsigns

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] The battle of the callsigns
From: dennis o'connor <k8do@mailblocks.com>
Reply-to: k8do@mailblocks.com
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 05:16:48 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
So anyone with a 2x3 call might as well take up stamp collecting, eh... OTOH, not is all as it seems...

Over the years I have been working on recruiting new contestors into the hobby... I have watched as I let them use my station on their own, and wade into a contest scrum, with all of the noise, confusion, and fear... One thing that has struck me over the years is that for the low experience contestor - that is first contest on his own or only casual operating in the past - is that these supposed advantage calls 1x1, etc. totally throw the low experience contestor... They hesitate because they 'know' they are missing part of the call... I have watched as they listen to the 1x1 at 35 wpm, or HC8N at 45 wpm for example, over and over, and finally look at me with fear and confusion in their face, and ask what they should do... I aways tell them that if they cannot copy the call after three times, turn the dial and move on as they are losing points by sitting there... I can see the light bulb go on in their head, they move up the band a couple of kc, and voila there is a Q they can copy and suddenly they are having fun again...

Now remember, that the majority of calls in the log of a flagship station are part time or casual contestors - guys that get on for three hours on Sunday afternoon, etc.. So by cranking the speed way up the big guns are losing Q's even as they reducing their F1 total time for the contest...

Denny

----------------------------------------------
Mailblocks - A Better Way to Do Email
http://about.mailblocks.com/info

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>