Yes, thanks Ev. That is exactly why I asked the question. The answer I got
was the one I was anticipating. I just wish the ARRL would use similar
wording for both the Unlimited as well as Multiop classes. Rules should be
somewhat terse but not ambiguous.
73 - Guy, N7ZG
> Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 06:58:59 -0800> From: w2ev@yahoo.com> To:
> cq-contest@contesting.com> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Quick question> > -----
> Original Message ----> From: Guy Molinari guy_molinari@hotmail.com> > > The
> SS rules say that spotting assistance is allowed for multi-ops. Does this
> mean general use of the packet cluster, or an op on a second radio?> > Sorry
> for the dumb question.> ---------------------------> > Hi Guy,> I'm
> interested in the reply to your inquiry, too. Interestingly, this is related
> to an earlier e-mail in which I asked for the definition of "spotting". It is
> a term that is used to reference something that is often not allowed, yet it
> is undefined.> > As a result, it is often used in counterintuitive ways. In
> this case, "spotting" and "assistance" are two different terms in the
> contesting world...or are they? :)> > Ev, W2EV> > >
> _______________________________________________> CQ-Contest mailing list>
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com> http://lists.contesti
ng.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_________________________________________________________________
Use Messenger to talk to your IM friends, even those on Yahoo!
http://ideas.live.com/programpage.aspx?versionId=7adb59de-a857-45ba-81cc-685ee3e858fe
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|