>
> In a blog model, the person who is responsible for the content of the
blog is clearly identified and what they say is clearly visible and
searchable. It is authoritative within that context.
>
> By visiting the "ARRL Contests" blog (if it existed), Tom Hogerty would
be identified as the Blogger, along with contact information...along with
all of the rulings/interpretations from all past Contest administrators
(including Dan Henderson, who would now be shown as the blogger for the
"ARRL Regulatory" blog if it existed).
>
> The correct answer would be searchable there. If it didn't exist, then
Tom could be contacted...provide clarification to the inquirer...and update
the Blog so that there would be little need for a second call on the same
topic (unless the ruling was ambiguous). Blogging can actually reduce
workload, if done with a purpose in mind.
>
> 73,
> Ev, W2EV
>
I agree with Ev. This is a great idea.
Beep beep,
de Hans, K0HB
--
><{{{{*> http://www.home.earthlink.net/~k0hb
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|