CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW defined "single op"

To: vo1he@rac.ca
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW defined "single op"
From: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 17:10:31 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 19:45:57 -0000, "Paul J. Piercey"
 <p.piercey@nl.rogers.com> wrote:

>OK, so here's my beef. If that's so cut and dried, why does one contest
>sponsor declare that a single op using spotting networks is assisted in one
>contest while, in another, calls the same thing a "multi-op"?

------------ REPLY FOLLOWS ------------

In a sense, both are the same thing with different names. One has the
other ops in your shack, the other has them in other shacks, but the
point is you are being assisted either way.

Granted, the ones in your shack can do other things in addition to
spotting, but you get the general idea. Help is help.

Bill, W6WRT
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>