CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] ETHICS

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ETHICS
From: "Yuri Onipko" <ve3dz@primus.ca>
Reply-to: Yuri Onipko <ve3dz@primus.ca>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:58:39 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Exactly my point, Chad.
I am operating the Contest, not enforcing the other countries rules and 
regulations.
I would leave it for the appropriate people.

Yuri  VE3DZ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chad WE9V" <chad.we9v@gmail.com>
To: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>; <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 12:04 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ETHICS


> This brings up an interesting point.  Is it really the VE's responsibility
> to know that every answer to his CQs is within their band or license 
> class?
> Sure, this example is a little easier, knowing that US hams can't go below
> 14150, but what if he was on 14153 and a US general class licensee call
> him?  Should he quickly evaluate every caller to see if they are approved 
> to
> operate on 14153?  If you say "of course not", I ask you, what's the
> difference? In either case, the US ham is operating beyond their license
> class.  Why is it the VE's responsibility to police him if under 14150 and
> not at 14153?
>
> Chad WE9V
>

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>