CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Categories, Participation and Competition

To: "'RT Clay'" <rt_clay@bellsouth.net>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Categories, Participation and Competition
From: "Edward" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: sawyered@earthlink.net
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:55:35 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
None...I don't like many of those contest.  But I am not advocating
short contest windows.  I enjoy the 36 and 48 hour contests.

Ed N1UR

-----Original Message-----
From: RT Clay [mailto:rt_clay@bellsouth.net] 
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 10:04 AM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com; sawyered@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Categories, Participation and Competition



>  
> 
> I must say that for years, I have read in this reflector
> the discussion
> of the "multitudes" of "casual contesters" that would
> become serious
> with smaller competitive time requirements.  Yet IARU
> (24 hours) and
> IOTA (12 hours) don't bring out these multitudes.  The
> NAQP is active
> and fun and sure there a some (not a lot quite frankly) different
> players in that one but I believe that the gepgraphic
> competition issues
> are as much a difference as time.  Look at SS vs. IARU
> (both 24 hours)
> yet wildly different group because of geographic interests
> and just
> different contest personalities.
>  
> If this crowd proposing smaller hour competitive segments within a
> contest wants to make themselves heard and noticed..get off
> the
> reflector and "en masse" "run with the dogs" in IARU or


How many shortened-time contests did you operate in 2008 Ed? I don't see
your call in the results for SS, NA Sprint, NAQP, or IOTA :) ?

Tor
N4OGW

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>