CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Is holding QRG's legal?

To: <n2ic@arrl.net>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Is holding QRG's legal?
From: "Rick Lindquist, WW3DE" <ww3de@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:23:57 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
It's really sad (to me) that some contest rules seem to be in a never-ending
state of flux in a vain effort to outmaneuver those who would game the
system. This is a hobby, and it's supposed to be fun!

If someone wants to engage in this sort of behavior, let them. Should anyone
really care over the long haul? It's really easy to cheat, if that's what
someone wants to do.

By and large, ham radio contest rules already are too complex. 

73, Rick, WW3DE

-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Steve London
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2009 1:16 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Is holding QRG's legal?

Ed Muns wrote:
> It's beyond Single-Op "Unlimited" and is Multi-Op behavior.
> 
> Ed - W0YK

I wouldn't even say that it is ethical behavior for a multi-op.

Unfortunately, the rules are silent on this.

73,
Steve, N2IC
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>