CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Replacement for Novice Roundup?

To: "'Julius Fazekas'" <phriendly1@yahoo.com>, "'CQ-Contest'" <cq-contest@contesting.com>, "'Tom Osborne'" <w7why@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Replacement for Novice Roundup?
From: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 20:29:58 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
First major contest I ever won solo... on the Division level yet...
K3CR/T operated by WN3VAW

I saw a recent picture of the "new" K3CR shack, and they still have that
certificate hanging on the wall.  And thanks to the Contest Branch a few
years back, I have a duplicate hanging here at home.

73, ron w3wn

-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Julius Fazekas
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 8:44 AM
To: CQ-Contest; Tom Osborne
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Replacement for Novice Roundup?

Not sure about the winners, well possibly one, but do know one of the ummm
"players" still is ;o)

formerly WN2EOO ENY

73,
Julius

Julius Fazekas
N2WN

Tennessee Contest Group
http://www.k4ro.net/tcg/index.html
http://groups.google.com/group/tcg1?hl=en

Tennessee QSO Party
http://www.tnqp.org/

Elecraft K2/100 #4455
Elecraft K3/100 #366
Elecraft K3/100 #1875


--- On Wed, 12/16/09, Tom Osborne <w7why@verizon.net> wrote:

> From: Tom Osborne <w7why@verizon.net>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Replacement for Novice Roundup?
> To: "CQ-Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
> Date: Wednesday, December 16, 2009, 11:05 PM
> The NR was a fun contest.
> 
> I have some old QST's here that I have looked back through
> at the NR results 
> and have always wondered if any of those 2x3 callsign
> Novice winners are 
> still active in contesting with new calls.  Be
> interesting to see who they 
> are now.  73
> Tom W7WHY
> 
> 
> 
> > As a participant in the 1966 Novice Roundup (NR), I
> have always had a soft 
> > spot in my heart for that contest. I have been
> disappointed with the 
> > ARRL's decision to discontinue it, and although the
> level of 
> > novice/technician participation was pretty low at the
> end, they did little 
> > to replace it, despite promises to do so.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>