Dear Paul,
I do agree with your sayings. CW Contest is to work it with our ears, not
machines, not skimmers, not anything.
Maybe a bit cluster for 5-10 Mult. its OK inside our contest edges and our fun.
Why we run a CW contest ??? For our fun and to enjoy our amateur lives. Our
hobby, our passion. CW . That's all.
73,
Vlachopoulos George
SV1RP, RAAG Contest Manager
A1 Op. & One of SX1L-YK9SV-J49I-CS9L-CR3L
--- On Tue, 3/2/10, Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com> wrote:
From: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Reverse Beacon Network - too much success?
To: CQ-Contest@contesting.com
Date: Tuesday, March 2, 2010, 10:43 AM
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marijan Miletic" <s56a@bit.si>
> CW Skimmer is the greatest hamradio software contribution lately.
I'd vote for remote control - it puts the wires back into wireless.
> I hope it wouldn't take another 20 years until freely adopted
> as with DX Cluster.
The contesters who have freely adopted DX Cluster are those
who don't know, or don't care, about the difference between
the internet and amateur radio.
The contesters who want to freely adopt Skimmer are those
who prefer to treat CW as just another data mode.
> Blind mode for the blind minded contesters :-(
Better blind than ignorant?
73,
Paul EI5DI
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|